Literature DB >> 18978616

Effects of whole-body low-intensity resistance training with slow movement and tonic force generation on muscular size and strength in young men.

Michiya Tanimoto1, Kiyoshi Sanada, Kenta Yamamoto, Hiroshi Kawano, Yuko Gando, Izumi Tabata, Naokata Ishii, Motohiko Miyachi.   

Abstract

Our previous study showed that relatively low-intensity (approximately 50% one-repetition maximum [1RM]) resistance training (knee extension) with slow movement and tonic force generation (LST) caused as significant an increase in muscular size and strength as high-intensity (approximately 80% 1RM) resistance training with normal speed (HN). However, that study examined only local effects of one type of exercise (knee extension) on knee extensor muscles. The present study was performed to examine whether a whole-body LST resistance training regimen is as effective on muscular hypertrophy and strength gain as HN resistance training. Thirty-six healthy young men without experience of regular resistance training were assigned into three groups (each n = 12) and performed whole-body resistance training regimens comprising five types of exercise (vertical squat, chest press, latissimus dorsi pull-down, abdominal bend, and back extension: three sets each) with LST (approximately 55-60% 1RM, 3 seconds for eccentric and concentric actions, and no relaxing phase); HN (approximately 80-90% 1RM, 1 second for concentric and eccentric actions, 1 second for relaxing); and a sedentary control group (CON). The mean repetition maximum was eight-repetition maximum in LST and HN. The training session was performed twice a week for 13 weeks. The LST training caused significant (p < 0.05) increases in whole-body muscle thickness (6.8 +/- 3.4% in a sum of six sites) and 1RM strength (33.0 +/- 8.8% in a sum of five exercises) comparable with those induced by HN training (9.1 +/- 4.2%, 41.2 +/- 7.6% in each measurement item). There were no such changes in the CON group. The results suggest that a whole-body LST resistance training regimen is as effective for muscular hypertrophy and strength gain as HN resistance training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18978616     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318185f2b0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  34 in total

Review 1.  Intramuscular Anabolic Signaling and Endocrine Response Following Resistance Exercise: Implications for Muscle Hypertrophy.

Authors:  Adam M Gonzalez; Jay R Hoffman; Jeffrey R Stout; David H Fukuda; Darryn S Willoughby
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Author's reply to Steele and Fisher: "Scientific rigour: a heavy or light load to carry?": the importance of maintaining objectivity in drawing evidence-based conclusions.

Authors:  B Schoenfeld
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Upper but not lower limb resistance training increases arterial stiffness in humans.

Authors:  Takanobu Okamoto; Mitsuhiko Masuhara; Komei Ikuta
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Theory-based approach for maintaining resistance training in older adults with prediabetes: adherence, barriers, self-regulation strategies, treatment fidelity, costs.

Authors:  Richard A Winett; Brenda M Davy; Jyoti Savla; Elaina L Marinik; Sarah A Kelleher; Sheila G Winett; Tanya M Halliday; David M Williams
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 5.  Do metabolites that are produced during resistance exercise enhance muscle hypertrophy?

Authors:  Scott J Dankel; Kevin T Mattocks; Matthew B Jessee; Samuel L Buckner; J Grant Mouser; Jeremy P Loenneke
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 6.  Potential mechanisms for a role of metabolic stress in hypertrophic adaptations to resistance training.

Authors:  Brad J Schoenfeld
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Scientific rigour: a heavy or light load to carry?

Authors:  James Steele; James Fisher
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  High- and Low-Load Resistance Training: Interpretation and Practical Application of Current Research Findings.

Authors:  James Fisher; James Steele; Dave Smith
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Muscle activation during low- versus high-load resistance training in well-trained men.

Authors:  Brad J Schoenfeld; Bret Contreras; Jeffrey M Willardson; Fabio Fontana; Gul Tiryaki-Sonmez
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 10.  Is there a minimum intensity threshold for resistance training-induced hypertrophic adaptations?

Authors:  Brad J Schoenfeld
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 11.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.