Literature DB >> 18975709

Three-dimensional image registration of MR proximal femur images for the analysis of trabecular bone parameters.

Janet Blumenfeld1, Colin Studholme, Julio Carballido-Gamio, Dana Carpenter, Thomas M Link, Sharmila Majumdar.   

Abstract

This study investigated the feasibility of automatic image registration of MR high-spatial resolution proximal femur trabecular bone images as well as the effects of gray-level interpolation and volume of interest (VOI) misalignment on MR-derived trabecular bone structure parameters. For six subjects in a short-term study, a baseline scan and a follow-up scan of the proximal femur were acquired on the same day. For ten subjects in a long-term study, a follow-up scan of the proximal femur was acquired 1 year after the baseline. An automatic image registration technique, based on mutual information, utilized a baseline and a follow-up scan to compute transform parameters that aligned the two images. In the short-term study, these parameters were subsequently used to transform the follow-up image with three different gray-level interpolators. Nearest-neighbor interpolation and B-spline approximation did not significantly alter bone parameters, while linear interpolation significantly modified bone parameters (p<0.01). Improvement in image alignment due to the automatic registration for the long-term and short-term study was determined by inspecting difference images and 3D renderings. This work demonstrates the first application of automatic registration, without prior segmentation, of high-spatial resolution trabecular bone MR images of the proximal femur. Additionally, inherent heterogeneity in trabecular bone structure and imprecise positioning of the VOI along the slice (anterior-posterior) direction resulted in significant changes in bone parameters (p<0.01). Results suggest that automatic mutual information registration using B-spline approximation or nearest neighbor gray-level interpolation to transform the final image ensures VOI alignment between baseline and follow-up images and does not compromise the integrity of MR-derived trabecular bone parameters used in this study.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18975709      PMCID: PMC2673590          DOI: 10.1118/1.2977764

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  30 in total

1.  Survey: interpolation methods in medical image processing.

Authors:  T M Lehmann; C Gönner; K Spitzer
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Comparison of interpolating methods for image resampling.

Authors:  J Parker; R V Kenyon; D E Troxel
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Automatic prospective registration of high-resolution trabecular bone images of the tibia.

Authors:  Janet Blumenfeld; Julio Carballido-Gamio; Roland Krug; Daniel J Blezek; Ileana Hancu; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Cancellous bone volume and structure in the forearm: noninvasive assessment with MR microimaging and image processing.

Authors:  F W Wehrli; S N Hwang; J Ma; H K Song; J C Ford; J G Haddad
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information.

Authors:  F Maes; A Collignon; D Vandermeulen; G Marchal; P Suetens
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 6.  Assessment of trabecular structure using high resolution magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  S Majumdar; H K Genant
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  1997

7.  Pathogenesis of osteoporosis.

Authors:  D W Dempster; R Lindsay
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-03-27       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Mechanical property distributions in the cancellous bone of the human proximal femur.

Authors:  T D Brown; A B Ferguson
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1980-06

Review 9.  Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  Steven R Cummings; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-05-18       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Reproducibility and error sources of micro-MRI-based trabecular bone structural parameters of the distal radius and tibia.

Authors:  B R Gomberg; F W Wehrli; B Vasilić; R H Weening; P K Saha; H K Song; A C Wright
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  4 in total

1.  Noncontact ultrasound imaging applied to cortical bone phantoms.

Authors:  J B Bulman; K S Ganezer; P W Halcrow; Ian Neeson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  High-resolution imaging techniques for the assessment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Roland Krug; Andrew J Burghardt; Sharmila Majumdar; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.303

3.  Generation of an atlas of the proximal femur and its application to trabecular bone analysis.

Authors:  Julio Carballido-Gamio; Jenny Folkesson; Dimitrios C Karampinos; Thomas Baum; Thomas M Link; Sharmila Majumdar; Roland Krug
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Bone marrow lesions are associated with altered trabecular morphometry.

Authors:  J B Driban; A Tassinari; G H Lo; L L Price; E Schneider; J A Lynch; C B Eaton; T E McAlindon
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 6.576

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.