Literature DB >> 18975074

Patient preference and acceptance with sodium phosphate tablet preparation for colonoscopy.

Suryakanth R Gurudu1, Feng Li, David E Fleischer, Virender K Sharma, Russell I Heigh, Michael D Crowell, Michael Lee, Joseph G Hentz, Jonathan A Leighton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy is considered the primary procedure for colorectal cancer screening and prevention. However patient acceptance of this procedure has been poor. A major deterrent for patients is the need for a large-volume (4-l) preprocedure colonic preparation (polyethylene glycol [PEG] solution) that can be associated with a bad taste. AIM: To determine patient preference and acceptance of the NaP tablet preparation in patients who have previously used PEG solutions for their prior colonoscopy exams.
METHODS: Patients who had used a standard 4-l PEG solution preparation for a colonoscopy within the past 12 months and who were scheduled for a repeat colonoscopy were invited to participate in this study. A preprocedural questionnaire was administered to the patients. The primary outcome measure was whether the patient indicated a preference for the NaP tablet preparation over the previous PEG solution.
RESULTS: Thirty-five of 53 participants (66%) who completed the study preferred the NaP tablet preparation over 4-l PEG. A majority of patients also indicated that they would use the NaP tablet preparation again and would like to have a choice of preparation for their next colonoscopy.
CONCLUSIONS: Among patients who previously used a 4-l PEG preparation for colon cleansing and participated in this study, 66% of patients preferred the NaP tablet preparation over the PEG preparation for their colonoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18975074     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-008-0527-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  14 in total

1.  Screening for colon cancer.

Authors:  J P Heiken
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 3.909

2.  Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380.

Authors:  D A Lieberman; D G Weiss; J H Bond; D J Ahnen; H Garewal; G Chejfec
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-07-20       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  A novel tableted purgative for colonoscopic preparation: efficacy and safety comparisons with Colyte and Fleet Phospho-Soda.

Authors:  C A Aronchick; W H Lipshutz; S H Wright; F Dufrayne; G Bergman
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Relative sensitivity of colonoscopy and barium enema for detection of colorectal cancer in clinical practice.

Authors:  D K Rex; E Y Rahmani; J H Haseman; G T Lemmel; S Kaster; J S Buckley
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  A randomized prospective trial comparing oral sodium phosphate with standard polyethylene glycol-based lavage solution (Golytely) in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy.

Authors:  S J Vanner; P H MacDonald; W G Paterson; R S Prentice; L R Da Costa; I T Beck
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Efficacy and tolerability of a new formulation of sodium phosphate tablets (INKP-101), and a reduced sodium phosphate dose, in colon cleansing: a single-center open-label pilot trial.

Authors:  M Khashab; D K Rex
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 8.171

7.  Safety and efficacy of two reduced dosing regimens of sodium phosphate tablets for preparation prior to colonoscopy.

Authors:  D K Rex; R Chasen; M B Pochapin
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 8.171

8.  Prospective, randomized trial comparing sodium phosphate solution with polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage for colonoscopy preparation.

Authors:  J B Marshall; J J Pineda; J S Barthel; P D King
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  A prospective, controlled assessment of factors influencing acceptance of screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Gavin C Harewood; Maurits J Wiersema; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Prospective, randomized, endoscopic-blinded trial comparing precolonoscopy bowel cleansing methods.

Authors:  S M Cohen; S D Wexner; S R Binderow; J J Nogueras; N Daniel; E D Ehrenpreis; J Jensen; G F Bonner; W B Ruderman
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  1 in total

1.  A Randomized Prospective Study of Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy with Low-Dose Sodium Phosphate Tablets versus Polyethylene Glycol Electrolyte Solution.

Authors:  Erina Kumagai; Tomoyoshi Shibuya; Masae Makino; Takashi Murakami; Shiori Takashima; Hideaki Ritsuno; Hiroya Ueyama; Tomohiro Kodani; Hitoshi Sasaki; Kenshi Matsumoto; Naoto Sakamoto; Taro Osada; Akihito Nagahara; Tatsuo Ogihara; Sumio Watanabe
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 2.260

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.