Literature DB >> 2183591

A randomized prospective trial comparing oral sodium phosphate with standard polyethylene glycol-based lavage solution (Golytely) in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy.

S J Vanner1, P H MacDonald, W G Paterson, R S Prentice, L R Da Costa, I T Beck.   

Abstract

One hundred and two patients were randomized to receive either oral sodium phosphate or standard polyethylene glycol-based lavage solution (Golytely) prior to colonoscopy in order to establish whether the much smaller volume of the former agent enhanced patient tolerance while maintaining or improving effectiveness and safety. Overall, patients found sodium phosphate preparation much easier to complete. In 37 patients who had had a previous colonoscopy prepared with Golytely, 100% of those now receiving sodium phosphate found it easier to complete and over 90% felt it caused less discomfort, compared with their previous experience with Golytely. Colonoscopists, unaware of the type of lavage solution used, scored the degree of colonic cleansing significantly higher for sodium phosphate-prepared colons compared with colons prepared with Golytely. Serial measurements of blood tests and postural pulse and blood pressure changes did not reveal any clinically significant changes in intravascular volume. Hyperphosphatemia was noted with sodium phosphate, but was transient, and no concomitant decrease in calcium was seen. Histological assessment for possible preparation-induced changes revealed no difference between the two agents. Sodium phosphate is significantly less expensive than Golytely. We conclude that, in the group of patients studied, sodium phosphate is a safe colonic cleansing agent that is better tolerated and more effective than Golytely.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2183591

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  67 in total

1.  National CT colonography trial (ACRIN 6664): comparison of three full-laxative bowel preparations in more than 2500 average-risk patients.

Authors:  Amy K Hara; Mark D Kuo; Meridith Blevins; Mei-Hsiu Chen; Judy Yee; Abraham Dachman; Christine O Menias; Betina Siewert; Jugesh I Cheema; Richard G Obregon; Jeff L Fidler; Peter Zimmerman; Karen M Horton; Kevin Coakley; Revathy B Iyer; Robert A Halvorsen; Giovanna Casola; C Daniel Johnson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Bowel preparation: current status.

Authors:  James E Duncan; Christie M Quietmeyer
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2009-02

Review 3.  Commonly used preparations for colonoscopy: efficacy, tolerability, and safety--a Canadian Association of Gastroenterology position paper.

Authors:  Alan Barkun; Naoki Chiba; Robert Enns; Margaret Marcon; Susan Natsheh; Co Pham; Dan Sadowski; Stephen Vanner
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.522

4.  A consensus document on bowel preparation before colonoscopy: prepared by a task force from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES).

Authors:  Steven D Wexner; David E Beck; Todd H Baron; Robert D Fanelli; Neil Hyman; Bo Shen; Kevin E Wasco
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-06-08       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  A life threatening complication after ingestion of sodium phosphate bowel preparation.

Authors:  Y Mun Woo; Susan Crail; Graham Curry; Colin C Geddes
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-09-16

6.  Comparative study of two bowel preparation regimens for colonoscopy: senna tablets vs sodium phosphate solution.

Authors:  Savit Kositchaiwat; Weerapat Suwanthanmma; Ronnarat Suvikapakornkul; Vaewvadee Tiewthanom; Prisna Rerkpatanakit; Chaowalitr Tinkornrusmee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  David E Beck
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2010-02

8.  Polyethylene glycol vs. sodium phosphate for bowel preparation: a treatment arm meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ravi Juluri; George Eckert; Thomas F Imperiale
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  Prospective randomized comparison of oral sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol lavage for colonoscopy preparation.

Authors:  Kai-Lin Hwang; William Tzu-Liang Chen; Koung-Hong Hsiao; Hong-Chang Chen; Ting-Ming Huang; Chien-Ming Chiu; Ger-Haur Hsu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  Oral colorectal cleansing preparations in adults.

Authors:  Sherief Shawki; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.