Literature DB >> 18973584

Modulating activity in the motor cortex affects performance for the two hands differently depending upon which hemisphere is stimulated.

Bradley W Vines1, Dinesh Nair, Gottfried Schlaug.   

Abstract

We modulated neural excitability in the human motor cortex to investigate behavioral effects for both hands. In a previous study, we showed that decreasing excitability in the dominant motor cortex led to a decline in performance for the contralateral hand and an improvement for the ipsilateral hand; increasing excitability produced the opposite effects. Research suggests that the ipsilateral effects were mediated by interhemispheric inhibition. Physiological evidence points to an asymmetry in interhemispheric inhibition between the primary motor cortices, with stronger inhibitory projections coming from the dominant motor cortex. In the present study, we examined whether there is a hemispheric asymmetry in the effects on performance when modulating excitability in the motor cortex. Anodal and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation were applied to the motor cortex of 17 participants, targeting the non-dominant hemisphere on one day and the dominant hemisphere on another day, along with one sham session. Participants performed a finger-sequence coordination task with each hand before and after stimulation. The dependent variable was calculated as the percentage of change in the number of correct keystrokes. We found that the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation depended upon which hemisphere was stimulated; modulating excitability in the dominant motor cortex significantly affected performance for the contralateral and ipsilateral hands, whereas modulating excitability in the non-dominant motor cortex only had a significant impact for the contralateral hand. These results provide evidence for a hemispheric asymmetry in the ipsilateral effects of modulating excitability in the motor cortex and may be important for clinical research on motor recovery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18973584     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06459.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  44 in total

1.  Hemispheric asymmetries of motor versus nonmotor processes during (visuo)motor control.

Authors:  Dorothée V Callaert; Katrien Vercauteren; Ronald Peeters; Fred Tam; Simon Graham; Stephan P Swinnen; Stefan Sunaert; Nicole Wenderoth
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Motor Cortex Biases Action Choice in a Perceptual Decision Task.

Authors:  Amir-Homayoun Javadi; Angeliki Beyko; Vincent Walsh; Ryota Kanai
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Probing for hemispheric specialization for motor skill learning: a transcranial direct current stimulation study.

Authors:  Heidi M Schambra; Mitsunari Abe; David A Luckenbaugh; Janine Reis; John W Krakauer; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Improving motor performance without training: the effect of combining mirror visual feedback with transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Erik von Rein; Maike Hoff; Elisabeth Kaminski; Bernhard Sehm; Christopher J Steele; Arno Villringer; Patrick Ragert
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on human regional cerebral blood flow.

Authors:  Xin Zheng; David C Alsop; Gottfried Schlaug
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  The right inhibition? Callosal correlates of hand performance in healthy children and adolescents callosal correlates of hand performance.

Authors:  Florian Kurth; Emeran A Mayer; Arthur W Toga; Paul M Thompson; Eileen Luders
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Transcranial direct current stimulation generates a transient increase of small-world in brain connectivity: an EEG graph theoretical analysis.

Authors:  Fabrizio Vecchio; Riccardo Di Iorio; Francesca Miraglia; Giuseppe Granata; Roberto Romanello; Placido Bramanti; Paolo Maria Rossini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Neural motor control differs between bimanual common-goal vs. bimanual dual-goal tasks.

Authors:  Wan-Wen Liao; Jill Whitall; Joseph E Barton; Sandy McCombe Waller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Bihemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation enhances effector-independent representations of motor synergy and sequence learning.

Authors:  Sheena Waters-Metenier; Masud Husain; Tobias Wiestler; Jörn Diedrichsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the prefrontal cortex enhances complex verbal associative thought.

Authors:  Carlo Cerruti; Gottfried Schlaug
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.