Literature DB >> 18971478

On-line processing of uncertain information in visuomotor control.

Jun Izawa1, Reza Shadmehr.   

Abstract

Our sensory observations represent a delayed, noisy estimate of the environment. Delay causes instability and noise causes uncertainty. To deal with these problems, theory suggests that the processing of sensory information by the brain should be probabilistic: to start a movement or to alter it midflight, our brain should make predictions about the near future of sensory states and then continuously integrate the delayed sensory measures with predictions to form an estimate of the current state. To test the predictions of this theory, we asked participants to reach to the center of a blurry target. With increased uncertainty about the target, reach reaction times increased. Occasionally, we changed the position of the target or its blurriness during the reach. We found that the motor response to a given second target was influenced by the uncertainty about the first target. The specific trajectories of motor responses were consistent with predictions of a "minimum variance" state estimator. That is, the motor output that the brain programmed to start a reaching movement or correct it midflight was a continuous combination of two streams of information: a stream that predicted the near future of the state of the environment and a stream that provided a delayed measurement of that state.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18971478      PMCID: PMC2729125          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3063-08.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  32 in total

1.  Voluntary modification of automatic arm movements evoked by motion of a visual target.

Authors:  B L Day; I N Lyon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Neural correlates of a decision in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of the macaque.

Authors:  J N Kim; M N Shadlen
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  The influence of urgency on decision time.

Authors:  B A Reddi; R H Carpenter
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Noise reveals visual mechanisms of detection and discrimination.

Authors:  Joshua A Solomon
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination.

Authors:  Emanuel Todorov; Michael I Jordan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Konrad P Körding; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Sensory uncertainty governs the extent of audio-visual interaction.

Authors:  J Heron; D Whitaker; P V McGraw
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Virtual lesions of the anterior intraparietal area disrupt goal-dependent on-line adjustments of grasp.

Authors:  Eugene Tunik; Scott H Frey; Scott T Grafton
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-03-20       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Motor adaptation as a process of reoptimization.

Authors:  Jun Izawa; Tushar Rane; Opher Donchin; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Contrast discrimination function: spatial cuing effects.

Authors:  J A Solomon; N Lavie; M J Morgan
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.129

View more
  49 in total

1.  Flexible, task-dependent use of sensory feedback to control hand movements.

Authors:  David C Knill; Amulya Bondada; Manu Chhabra
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Knowing how much you don't know: a neural organization of uncertainty estimates.

Authors:  Dominik R Bach; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  TMS perturbs saccade trajectories and unmasks an internal feedback controller for saccades.

Authors:  Minnan Xu-Wilson; Jing Tian; Reza Shadmehr; David S Zee
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Sensitivity to prediction error in reach adaptation.

Authors:  Mollie K Marko; Adrian M Haith; Michelle D Harran; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  The temporal evolution of feedback gains rapidly update to task demands.

Authors:  Michael Dimitriou; Daniel M Wolpert; David W Franklin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Models for the extrapolation of target motion for manual interception.

Authors:  John F Soechting; John Z Juveli; Hrishikesh M Rao
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  The impact of real and illusory target perturbations on manual aiming.

Authors:  Lawrence E M Grierson; Digby Elliott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Reaction times for allocentric movements are 35 ms slower than reaction times for target-directed movements.

Authors:  Lore Thaler; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-24       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Uncertainty of feedback and state estimation determines the speed of motor adaptation.

Authors:  Kunlin Wei; Konrad Körding
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 2.380

10.  Bayesian integration and non-linear feedback control in a full-body motor task.

Authors:  Ian H Stevenson; Hugo L Fernandes; Iris Vilares; Kunlin Wei; Konrad P Körding
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.