Literature DB >> 21832184

TMS perturbs saccade trajectories and unmasks an internal feedback controller for saccades.

Minnan Xu-Wilson1, Jing Tian, Reza Shadmehr, David S Zee.   

Abstract

When we applied a single pulse of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to any part of the human head during a saccadic eye movement, the ongoing eye velocity was reduced as early as 45 ms after the TMS, and lasted ∼32 ms. The perturbation to the saccade trajectory was not due to a mechanical effect of the lid on the eye (e.g., from blinks). When the saccade involved coordinated movements of both the eyes and the lids, e.g., in vertical saccades, TMS produced a synchronized inhibition of the motor commands to both eye and lid muscles. The TMS-induced perturbation of the eye trajectory did not show habituation with repetition, and was present in both pro-saccades and anti-saccades. Despite the perturbation, the eye trajectory was corrected within the same saccade with compensatory motor commands that guided the eyes to the target. This within-saccade correction did not rely on visual input, suggesting that the brain monitored the oculomotor commands as the saccade unfolded, maintained a real-time estimate of the position of the eyes, and corrected for the perturbation. TMS disrupted saccades regardless of the location of the coil on the head, suggesting that the coil discharge engages a nonhabituating startle-like reflex system. This system affects ongoing motor commands upstream of the oculomotor neurons, possibly at the level of the superior colliculus or omnipause neurons. Therefore, a TMS pulse centrally perturbs saccadic motor commands, which are monitored possibly via efference copy and are corrected via internal feedback.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21832184      PMCID: PMC3167087          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1584-11.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  40 in total

1.  Blink-perturbed saccades in monkey. II. Superior colliculus activity.

Authors:  H H Goossens; A J Van Opstal
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  A distributed model of the saccade system: simulations of temporally perturbed saccades using position and velocity feedback.

Authors:  K Arai; S Das; E L. Keller; E Aiyoshi
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  1999-12

3.  Enhancement of electrically evoked startle-like responses by tetanic stimulation of the superior colliculus.

Authors:  Chunmei Lin; Xun Wan; Wei Zhao; Cheng Ma; Chenfei Ma; Yuan Gao; Yin Zhou; John S Yeomans; Liang Li
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2002-10-07       Impact factor: 1.837

4.  Patterned ballistic movements triggered by a startle in healthy humans.

Authors:  J Valls-Solé; J C Rothwell; F Goulart; G Cossu; E Muñoz
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-05-01       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Magnetically elicited blink reflex: an alternative to conventional electrical stimulation.

Authors:  C Bischoff; R Liscic; B U Meyer; J Machetanz; B Conrad
Journal:  Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug

6.  Corollary discharge provides accurate eye position information to the oculomotor system.

Authors:  B L Guthrie; J D Porter; D L Sparks
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-09-16       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Slow saccades in spinocerebellar degeneration.

Authors:  D S Zee; L M Optican; J D Cook; D A Robinson; W K Engel
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1976-04

Review 8.  Human studies of prepulse inhibition of startle: normal subjects, patient groups, and pharmacological studies.

Authors:  D L Braff; M A Geyer; N R Swerdlow
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Ocular oscillations generated by coupling of brainstem excitatory and inhibitory saccadic burst neurons.

Authors:  Stefano Ramat; R John Leigh; David S Zee; Lance M Optican
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Cerebellar contributions to adaptive control of saccades in humans.

Authors:  Minnan Xu-Wilson; Haiyin Chen-Harris; David S Zee; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Are we ready for a natural history of motor learning?

Authors:  Lior Shmuelof; John W Krakauer
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  The perturbation paradigm modulates error-based learning in a highly automated task: outcomes in swallowing kinematics.

Authors:  C Anderson; P Macrae; I Taylor-Kamara; S Serel; A Vose; I A Humbert
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2015-05-28

Review 3.  Distinct neural circuits for control of movement vs. holding still.

Authors:  Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Eye Movement Research in the Twenty-First Century-a Window to the Brain, Mind, and More.

Authors:  Aasef G Shaikh; David S Zee
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.847

5.  Movement vigor as a traitlike attribute of individuality.

Authors:  Thomas R Reppert; Ioannis Rigas; David J Herzfeld; Ehsan Sedaghat-Nejad; Oleg Komogortsev; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Revisiting corrective saccades: role of visual feedback.

Authors:  Jing Tian; Howard S Ying; David S Zee
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Limited Contribution of Primary Motor Cortex in Eye-Hand Coordination: A TMS Study.

Authors:  James Mathew; Alexandre Eusebio; Frederic Danion
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Efficient and robust identification of cortical targets in concurrent TMS-fMRI experiments.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Yau; Jun Hua; Diana A Liao; John E Desmond
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Selective Attention Gates the Interactive Crossmodal Coupling between Perceptual Systems.

Authors:  Silvia Convento; Md Shoaibur Rahman; Jeffrey M Yau
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Does the Brain Extrapolate the Position of a Transient Moving Target?

Authors:  Julie Quinet; Laurent Goffart
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.