Literature DB >> 18963158

Seasonal distribution of total and pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Chesapeake Bay oysters and waters.

Salina Parveen1, Kumidini A Hettiarachchi, John C Bowers, Jessica L Jones, Mark L Tamplin, Rusty McKay, William Beatty, Kathy Brohawn, Ligia V Dasilva, Angelo Depaola.   

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to investigate the seasonal distribution of total and pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus in the Chesapeake Bay oysters and waters, and to determine the degree of association between V. parahaemolyticus densities and selected environmental parameters. Oyster and water samples were collected monthly from three sites in Chesapeake Bay, Maryland from November 2004 through October 2005. During collection of samples, water temperature, salinity, turbidity, dissolved oxygen, pH, chlorophyll a, and fecal coliform levels in oysters were also determined. V. parahaemolyticus levels were enumerated by a quantitative direct-plating method followed by DNA colony hybridization; presence/absence was further determined by overnight broth enrichment followed by either standard colony isolation or real-time PCR. The thermolabile hemolysin (tlh) gene and thermostable direct hemolysin (tdh) gene were targeted for detection of total and pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus, respectively, for both direct plating and enrichment. The thermostable related hemolysin (trh) gene, which is a presumptive pathogenicity marker, was targeted only for the enrichment approach. By direct plating, colonies producing tlh signals were detected in 79% of oyster samples at densities ranging from 1.5x10(1) to 6.0x10(2) CFU/g. Pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus (tdh+) was detected in 3% (level was 10 CFU/g) of oyster samples while no V. parahaemolyticus was detected in water samples. By the enrichment approach with standard colony isolation, 67% of oyster and 55% of water samples (n=33) were positive for total V. parahaemolyticus, and all samples were negative for pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus. In contrast, enrichment followed by real-time PCR detected tlh, tdh and trh in 100%, 20% and 40% of oyster and 100%, 13% and 40% of water enrichments collected from June to October 2005, respectively. V. parahaemolyticus densities in oysters varied seasonally and were found to be positively correlated with water temperature, turbidity, and dissolved oxygen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18963158     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.09.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol        ISSN: 0168-1605            Impact factor:   5.277


  47 in total

1.  Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Rhode Island coastal ponds and the estuarine environment of narragansett bay.

Authors:  Annie M Cox; Marta Gomez-Chiarri
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Establishment and Validation of RNA-Based Predictive Models for Understanding Survival of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Oysters Stored at Low Temperatures.

Authors:  Chao Liao; Yong Zhao; Luxin Wang
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Rapid proliferation of Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Vibrio vulnificus, and Vibrio cholerae during freshwater flash floods in French Mediterranean coastal lagoons.

Authors:  Kevin Esteves; Dominique Hervio-Heath; Thomas Mosser; Claire Rodier; Marie-George Tournoud; Estelle Jumas-Bilak; Rita R Colwell; Patrick Monfort
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Predictive models for the effect of storage temperature on Vibrio parahaemolyticus viability and counts of total viable bacteria in Pacific oysters (Crassostrea gigas).

Authors:  Judith Fernandez-Piquer; John P Bowman; Tom Ross; Mark L Tamplin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Seasonal abundance and distribution of Vibrio species in the treated effluent of wastewater treatment facilities in suburban and urban communities of Eastern Cape Province, South Africa.

Authors:  Etinosa O Igbinosa; Chikwelu L Obi; Anthony I Okoh
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 3.422

6.  Environmental Determinants of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in the Chesapeake Bay.

Authors:  Benjamin J K Davis; John M Jacobs; Meghan F Davis; Kellogg J Schwab; Angelo DePaola; Frank C Curriero
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Defining the niche of Vibrio parahaemolyticus during pre- and post-monsoon seasons in the coastal Arabian Sea.

Authors:  A-S Rehnstam-Holm; V Atnur; A Godhe
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2013-10-26       Impact factor: 4.552

8.  Genes similar to the Vibrio parahaemolyticus virulence-related genes tdh, tlh, and vscC2 occur in other vibrionaceae species isolated from a pristine estuary.

Authors:  Savannah L Klein; Casandra K Gutierrez West; Diana M Mejia; Charles R Lovell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Genetic relationships of Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates from clinical, human carrier, and environmental sources in Thailand, determined by multilocus sequence analysis.

Authors:  Chonchanok Theethakaew; Edward J Feil; Santiago Castillo-Ramírez; David M Aanensen; Orasa Suthienkul; Douglas M Neil; Robert L Davies
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Quantification of Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Vibrio vulnificus and Vibrio cholerae in French Mediterranean coastal lagoons.

Authors:  Franck Cantet; Dominique Hervio-Heath; Audrey Caro; Cécile Le Mennec; Caroline Monteil; Catherine Quéméré; Anne Jolivet-Gougeon; Rita R Colwell; Patrick Monfort
Journal:  Res Microbiol       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 3.992

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.