Literature DB >> 1895944

The interpretation of isolated novel nominal compounds.

R Coolen1, H J Van Jaarsveld, R Schreuder.   

Abstract

The lexical decision task was used to investigate interpretative processing of isolated novel compounds (noun-noun nominals). On the basis of interpretability ratings, novel compounds were classified as being of either high or low interpretability. In a lexical decision task in which novel compounds functioned as nonwords, a significant interference effect was found for compounds of high interpretability. In a naming task, no differences were found between the two types of novel compounds, but lexicalized compounds resulted in shorter latencies than did novel compounds. Novel compounds were also shown to be interpreted under conditions unfavorable to morphological decomposition, suggesting that the interpretation process is beyond strategic control by the subject. Equal semantic priming effects were obtained for members of established semantic categories and nouns of highly interpretable compounds. Interpretative processes dealing with a limited set of basic semantic relations and analogy with lexicalized compounds are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1895944     DOI: 10.3758/bf03197138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  8 in total

1.  Lexical access and inflectional morphology.

Authors:  A Caramazza; A Laudanna; C Romani
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1988-04

2.  Context and structure in conceptual combination.

Authors:  D L Medin; E J Shoben
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  The time course of sense creation.

Authors:  R J Gerrig
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1989-03

4.  Types of linguistic knowledge: interpreting and producing compound nouns.

Authors:  E V Clark; R A Berman
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  1987-10

5.  Inheritance of attributes in natural concept conjunctions.

Authors:  J A Hampton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1987-01

6.  Ad hoc categories.

Authors:  L W Barsalou
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1983-05

7.  Pre- and postlexical loci of contextual effects on word recognition.

Authors:  M S Seidenberg; G S Waters; M Sanders; P Langer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1984-07

8.  A word's meaning affects the decision in lexical decision.

Authors:  J I Chumbley; D A Balota
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1984-11
  8 in total
  7 in total

1.  Electrophysiological evidence for the morpheme-based combinatoric processing of English compounds.

Authors:  Robert Fiorentino; Yuka Naito-Billen; Jamie Bost; Ella Fund-Reznicek
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Eye movements during the reading of compound words and the influence of lexeme meaning.

Authors:  Albrecht W Inhoff; Matthew S Starr; Matthew Solomon; Lars Placke
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-04

3.  Property instantiation in conceptual combination.

Authors:  E J Wisniewski
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-11

4.  When concepts combine.

Authors:  E J Wisniewski
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1997-06

5.  Language experience shapes relational knowledge of compound words.

Authors:  Daniel Schmidtke; Christina L Gagné; Victor Kuperman; Thomas L Spalding
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-08

6.  Processing novel compounds: evidence for interactive meaning activation of ambiguous nouns.

Authors:  R Coolen; H J van Jaarsveld; R Schreuder
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1993-03

7.  Competition between conceptual relations affects compound recognition: the role of entropy.

Authors:  Daniel Schmidtke; Victor Kuperman; Christina L Gagné; Thomas L Spalding
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.