Literature DB >> 24279696

Electrophysiological evidence for the morpheme-based combinatoric processing of English compounds.

Robert Fiorentino1, Yuka Naito-Billen, Jamie Bost, Ella Fund-Reznicek.   

Abstract

The extent to which the processing of compounds (e.g., "catfish") makes recourse to morphological-level representations remains a matter of debate. Moreover, positing a morpheme-level route to complex word recognition entails not only access to morphological constituents, but also combinatoric processes operating on the constituent representations; however, the neurophysiological mechanisms subserving decomposition, and in particular morpheme combination, have yet to be fully elucidated. The current study presents electrophysiological evidence for the morpheme-based processing of both lexicalized (e.g., "teacup") and novel (e.g., "tombnote") visually presented English compounds; these brain responses appear prior to and are dissociable from the eventual overt lexical decision response. The electrophysiological results reveal increased negativities for conditions with compound structure, including effects shared by lexicalized and novel compounds, as well as effects unique to each compound type, which may be related to aspects of morpheme combination. These findings support models positing across-the-board morphological decomposition, counter to models proposing that putatively complex words are primarily or solely processed as undecomposed representations, and motivate further electrophysiological research toward a more precise characterization of the nature and neurophysiological instantiation of complex word recognition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Compound words; Electroencephalography.; Lexical access; Lexical decision; Morphology

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24279696      PMCID: PMC4159414          DOI: 10.1080/02643294.2013.855633

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol        ISSN: 0264-3294            Impact factor:   2.468


  41 in total

1.  Explaining derivational morphology as the convergence of codes.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  The effects of morphology on the processing of compound words: evidence from naming, lexical decisions and eye fixations.

Authors:  Barbara J Juhasz; Matthew S Starr; Albrecht W Inhoff; Lars Placke
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2003-05

3.  Frequency effects in compound production.

Authors:  Heidrun Bien; Willem J M Levelt; R Harald Baayen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-11-21       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  ERP evidence of morphological analysis from orthography: a masked priming study.

Authors:  Aureliu Lavric; Amanda Clapp; Kathleen Rastle
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Electrophysiological evidence for incremental lexical-semantic integration in auditory compound comprehension.

Authors:  Dirk Koester; Henning Holle; Thomas C Gunter
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 6.  A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400.

Authors:  Ellen F Lau; Colin Phillips; David Poeppel
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 34.870

7.  Semantic composition engenders an N400: evidence from Chinese compounds.

Authors:  Chen Bai; Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky; Luming Wang; Yu-Chen Hung; Matthias Schlesewsky; Petra Burkhardt
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 1.837

Review 8.  The time course of syntactic activation during language processing: a model based on neuropsychological and neurophysiological data.

Authors:  A D Friederici
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  Phonotactic knowledge and lexical-semantic processing in one-year-olds: brain responses to words and nonsense words in picture contexts.

Authors:  Manuela Friedrich; Angela D Friederici
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Accentuate the positive: semantic access in english compounds.

Authors:  Victor Kuperman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-04-24
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  The neuroanatomic and neurophysiological infrastructure for speech and language.

Authors:  David Poeppel
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2014-07-26       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Dissociating morphological and form priming with novel complex word primes: Evidence from masked priming, overt priming, and event-related potentials.

Authors:  Robert Fiorentino; Stephen Politzer-Ahles; Natalie S Pak; María Teresa Martínez-García; Caitlin Coughlin
Journal:  Ment Lex       Date:  2015

3.  Do Morphemes Matter when Reading Compound Words with Transposed Letters? Evidence from Eye-Tracking and Event-Related Potentials.

Authors:  Mallory C Stites; Kara D Federmeier; Kiel Christianson
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 2.331

4.  Psycholinguistic norms for a set of 506 French compound words.

Authors:  Patrick Bonin; Betty Laroche; Alain Méot
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-07-08

5.  Evidence for morphological composition in compound words using MEG.

Authors:  Teon L Brooks; Daniela Cid de Garcia
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Unsupervised Text Segmentation Predicts Eye Fixations During Reading.

Authors:  Jinbiao Yang; Antal van den Bosch; Stefan L Frank
Journal:  Front Artif Intell       Date:  2022-02-23

7.  Meaning above (and in) the head: Combinatorial visual morphology from comics and emoji.

Authors:  Neil Cohn; Tom Foulsham
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-03-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.