Literature DB >> 18958476

Functional demands of dynamic biological adhesion: an integrative approach.

Anne M Peattie1.   

Abstract

Climbing organisms are constantly challenged to make their way rapidly and reliably across varied and often novel terrain. A diversity of morphologically and mechanically disparate attachment strategies have evolved across widely distributed phylogenetic groups to aid legged animals in scaling these surfaces, notable among them some very impressive adhesive pads. Despite the differences between, for example, the dry fibrillar pads of geckos and the smooth, secretion-aided pads of stick insects, I hypothesize that they face similar functional demands in their environment. I outline three broad criteria defining dynamic biological adhesion: reusability, reversibility, and substrate tolerance. Organismal adhesive pads must be able to attach repeatedly without significant decline in performance, detach easily at will, and adhere strongly to the broadest possible range of surfaces in their habitat. A survey of the literature suggests that evidence for these general principles can be found in existing research, but that many gaps remain to be filled. By taking a comparative, integrative approach to biological dynamic adhesion, rather than focusing on a few model organisms, investigators will continue to discover new and interesting attachment strategies in natural systems.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18958476     DOI: 10.1007/s00360-008-0310-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol B        ISSN: 0174-1578            Impact factor:   2.200


  62 in total

1.  Ultrastructural architecture and mechanical properties of attachment pads in Tettigonia viridissima (Orthoptera Tettigoniidae).

Authors:  S Gorb; Y Jiao; M Scherge
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Biomechanics of ant adhesive pads: frictional forces are rate- and temperature-dependent.

Authors:  Walter Federle; Werner Baumgartner; Bert Hölldobler
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Can a fibrillar interface be stronger and tougher than a non-fibrillar one?

Authors:  Tian Tang; Chung-Yuen Hui; Nicholas J Glassmaker
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Design of biomimetic fibrillar interfaces: 1. Making contact.

Authors:  N J Glassmaker; T Himeno; C-Y Hui; J Kim
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2004-11-22       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Dynamics of geckos running vertically.

Authors:  K Autumn; S T Hsieh; D M Dudek; J Chen; C Chitaphan; R J Full
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  The role of adhesion in prey capture and predator defence in arthropods.

Authors:  Oliver Betz; Gregor Kölsch
Journal:  Arthropod Struct Dev       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.010

7.  Adhesion enhancement through micropatterning at polydimethylsiloxane-acrylic adhesive interfaces.

Authors:  M Lamblet; E Verneuil; T Vilmin; A Buguin; P Silberzan; L Léger
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2007-05-19       Impact factor: 3.882

8.  Adhesion of biologically inspired vertical and angled polymer microfiber arrays.

Authors:  Burak Aksak; Michael P Murphy; Metin Sitti
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 3.882

9.  Strength statistics of adhesive contact between a fibrillar structure and a rough substrate.

Authors:  Pankaj K Porwal; Chung Yuen Hui
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-04-06       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  The structure of the digital setae of lizards.

Authors:  R Ruibal; V Ernst
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  1965-11       Impact factor: 1.804

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Dynamic biological adhesion: mechanisms for controlling attachment during locomotion.

Authors:  Walter Federle; David Labonte
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Non-equilibrium silk fibroin adhesives.

Authors:  Tuna Yucel; Nikola Kojic; Gary G Leisk; Tim J Lo; David L Kaplan
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 2.867

3.  Geckos cling best to, and prefer to use, rough surfaces.

Authors:  Rishab Pillai; Eric Nordberg; Jendrian Riedel; Lin Schwarzkopf
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 3.172

4.  Froghoppers jump from smooth plant surfaces by piercing them with sharp spines.

Authors:  Hanns Hagen Goetzke; Jonathan G Pattrick; Walter Federle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Arachnids secrete a fluid over their adhesive pads.

Authors:  Anne M Peattie; Jan-Henning Dirks; Sérgio Henriques; Walter Federle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Tree frog attachment: mechanisms, challenges, and perspectives.

Authors:  Julian K A Langowski; Dimitra Dodou; Marleen Kamperman; Johan L van Leeuwen
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 3.172

7.  Surface contact and design of fibrillar 'friction pads' in stick insects (Carausius morosus): mechanisms for large friction coefficients and negligible adhesion.

Authors:  David Labonte; John A Williams; Walter Federle
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 4.118

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.