Literature DB >> 17709325

Strength statistics of adhesive contact between a fibrillar structure and a rough substrate.

Pankaj K Porwal1, Chung Yuen Hui.   

Abstract

Equal distribution of load among fibrils in contact with a substrate is an important characteristic of fibrillar structures used by many small animals and insects for contact and adhesion. This is in contrast with continuum systems where stress concentration dominates interfacial failure. In this work, we study how adhesion strength of a fibrillar system depends on substrate roughness and variability of the fibril structure, which are modelled using probability distributions for fibril length and fibril attachment strength. Monte Carlo simulations are carried out to determine the adhesion strength statistics where fibril length follows normal or uniform distribution and attachment strength has a power-law form. Our results indicate that the strength distribution is Gaussian (normal) for both the uniform and the normal distributions for length. However, the fibrillar structure having normally distributed lengths has higher strength and lower toughness than one having uniformly distributed lengths. Our simulations also show that an increase in the compliance of the fibrils can compensate for both the substrate roughness and the attachment strength variation. We also show that, as the number of fibrils n increases, the load-carrying efficiency of each fibril goes down. For large n, this effect is found to be small. Furthermore, this effect is compensated by the fact that the standard deviation of the adhesive strength decreases as 1/ square root n.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17709325      PMCID: PMC2607384          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2007.1133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  16 in total

1.  Microfabricated adhesive mimicking gecko foot-hair.

Authors:  A K Geim; S V Dubonos; I V Grigorieva; K S Novoselov; A A Zhukov; S Yu Shapoval
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 43.841

2.  From micro to nano contacts in biological attachment devices.

Authors:  Eduard Arzt; Stanislav Gorb; Ralph Spolenak
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-09-05       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Evidence for self-cleaning in gecko setae.

Authors:  W R Hansen; K Autumn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Design of biomimetic fibrillar interfaces: 2. Mechanics of enhanced adhesion.

Authors:  C-Y Hui; N J Glassmaker; T Tang; A Jagota
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2004-11-22       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Spring model of biological attachment pads.

Authors:  M Schargott; V L Popov; S Gorb
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2006-06-13       Impact factor: 2.691

6.  Design of biomimetic fibrillar interfaces: 1. Making contact.

Authors:  N J Glassmaker; T Himeno; C-Y Hui; J Kim
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2004-11-22       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Resolving the nanoscale adhesion of individual gecko spatulae by atomic force microscopy.

Authors:  Gerrit Huber; Stanislav N Gorb; Ralph Spolenak; Eduard Arzt
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Biomimetic mushroom-shaped fibrillar adhesive microstructure.

Authors:  S Gorb; M Varenberg; A Peressadko; J Tuma
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2007-04-22       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Adhesion of bioinspired micropatterned surfaces: effects of pillar radius, aspect ratio, and preload.

Authors:  Christian Greiner; Aranzazu Del Campo; Eduard Arzt
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 3.882

10.  Mechanics of adhesion through a fibrillar microstructure.

Authors:  Anand Jagota; Stephen J Bennison
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.326

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Functional demands of dynamic biological adhesion: an integrative approach.

Authors:  Anne M Peattie
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 2.200

2.  Statistical properties of defect-dependent detachment strength in bioinspired dry adhesives.

Authors:  Jamie A Booth; Verena Tinnemann; René Hensel; Eduard Arzt; Robert M McMeeking; Kimberly L Foster
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Adhesive contact of rough brushes.

Authors:  Qiang Li; Valentin L Popov
Journal:  Beilstein J Nanotechnol       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.649

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.