Literature DB >> 17511481

Adhesion enhancement through micropatterning at polydimethylsiloxane-acrylic adhesive interfaces.

M Lamblet1, E Verneuil, T Vilmin, A Buguin, P Silberzan, L Léger.   

Abstract

Adhesion at polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)-acrylic adhesive interfaces is shown to be enhanced through micropatterning of the PDMS substrate. By varying the geometry of the patterns (groves and hexagonal arrays of pillars of micrometer sizes, obtained through soft lithography techniques) and comparing rigid and deformable substrates, the respective roles of the geometry and the size and flexibility of the pattern features on the level of adhesion have been analyzed. For cylindrical pillars, two regimes are clearly identified: for a relatively low aspect ratio (h/r < 3, with h and r, respectively, the height and the radius of the pillars), soft patterned substrates are more efficient than rigid ones at increasing adhesion, pointing out the role of the elastic energy associated with the deformation of the pattern that is lost when the adhesive detaches from the substrate. Using scaling laws, the predominant contribution to that elastic energy can be further identified: deformation of the substrate underlying the pillars for h/r < 1.6 or bending of the pillars for h/r > 1.6.; for a high aspect ratio (h/r > 3), only rigid patterned substrates enhance adhesion, then the only possible contribution to energy dissipation comes from the enhanced viscoelastic losses associated with the pattern that induce modifications of the strain field within the adhesive layer. Soft, high aspect ratio patterns lose their efficiency even if still bent under the effect of the peel forces. This is because when bent, some of the pillars touch each other and remain stuck together, lying flat on the surface after the passage of the peel front. The bending elastic energy of the pillars (which is still lost) is then balanced by the corresponding gain in surface energy of the substrate in the peeled region. These systematic experiments demonstrate that the ability of the patterned surface to be deformed plays a crucial role in enhancing adhesion and allow us to propose a way to fine tune the level of adhesion at PDMS-acrylic adhesive interfaces, independently of the chemistry of the adhesive.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 17511481     DOI: 10.1021/la063104h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langmuir        ISSN: 0743-7463            Impact factor:   3.882


  11 in total

Review 1.  Functional demands of dynamic biological adhesion: an integrative approach.

Authors:  Anne M Peattie
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 2.200

2.  Design of gecko-inspired fibrillar surfaces with strong attachment and easy-removal properties: a numerical analysis of peel-zone.

Authors:  Ming Zhou; Noshir Pesika; Hongbo Zeng; Jin Wan; Xiangjun Zhang; Yonggang Meng; Shizhu Wen; Yu Tian
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 3.  Materials, Devices, and Systems of On-Skin Electrodes for Electrophysiological Monitoring and Human-Machine Interfaces.

Authors:  Hao Wu; Ganguang Yang; Kanhao Zhu; Shaoyu Liu; Wei Guo; Zhuo Jiang; Zhuo Li
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 16.806

4.  Fabrication and adhesion of a bio-inspired microarray: capillarity-induced casting using porous silicon mold.

Authors:  Dong-Jie Guo; Hao Zhang; Jia-Bo Li; Shao-Ming Fang; Zhen-Dong Dai; Wei Tan
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 6.331

5.  Harnessing reversible dry adhesion using shape memory polymer microparticles.

Authors:  Wenbing Li; Junhao Liu; Wanting Wei; Kun Qian
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.036

6.  From immobilized cells to motile cells on a bed-of-nails: effects of vertical nanowire array density on cell behaviour.

Authors:  Henrik Persson; Zhen Li; Jonas O Tegenfeldt; Stina Oredsson; Christelle N Prinz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Understanding Surface Adhesion in Nature: A Peeling Model.

Authors:  Zhen Gu; Siheng Li; Feilong Zhang; Shutao Wang
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 16.806

8.  Transient adhesion in a non-fully detached contact.

Authors:  Zheyu Liu; Hongyu Lu; Yelong Zheng; Dashuai Tao; Yonggang Meng; Yu Tian
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Stimuli-responsive temporary adhesives: enabling debonding on demand through strategic molecular design.

Authors:  Nicholas D Blelloch; Hana J Yarbrough; Katherine A Mirica
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 9.825

10.  Role of indentation depth and contact area on human perception of softness for haptic interfaces.

Authors:  Charles Dhong; Rachel Miller; Nicholas B Root; Sumit Gupta; Laure V Kayser; Cody W Carpenter; Kenneth J Loh; Vilayanur S Ramachandran; Darren J Lipomi
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 14.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.