Literature DB >> 18958299

The effects of message quality and congruency on perceptions of tailored health communications.

John A Updegraff1, David K Sherman, Faith S Luyster, Traci L Mann.   

Abstract

Recent research has documented the effectiveness of tailoring health behavior change messages to characteristics of the recipients, but little is known about the processes underlying these effects. Drawing from the elaboration likelihood model (Petty & Cacioppo, 1986), we examined the role of message scrutiny in moderating the congruency effect (Mann, Sherman, & Updegraff, 2004). One hundred and thirty-six undergraduate participants read either a strong or weak message promoting regular dental flossing with a frame (gain vs. loss) that either matched or mismatched their motivational orientation (approach vs. avoidance). Results showed that participants were sensitive to argument quality in the matched but not mismatched conditions. Further, argument quality moderated the effect of congruency on participants' attitudes and perceived norms regarding flossing, as well as their subsequent self-reported flossing behavior. Results suggest that increased message scrutiny underlies message tailoring effects.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 18958299      PMCID: PMC2573043          DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2006.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-1031


  19 in total

Review 1.  One size does not fit all: the case for tailoring print materials.

Authors:  M W Kreuter; V J Strecher; B Glassman
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  1999

2.  Does locus of control moderate the effects of tailored health education materials?

Authors:  C L Holt; E M Clark; M W Kreuter; D P Scharff
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2000-08

3.  The effects of message framing and ethnic targeting on mammography use among low-income women.

Authors:  T R Schneider; P Salovey; A M Apanovitch; J Pizarro; D McCarthy; J Zullo; A J Rothman
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.267

4.  Why are you bringing up condoms now? The effect of message content on framing effects of condom use messages.

Authors:  Susan M Kiene; William D Barta; John M Zelenski; Dee Lisa Cothran
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.267

Review 5.  Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: the role of message framing.

Authors:  A J Rothman; P Salovey
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Predicting levels of preventive dental behaviors.

Authors:  K D McCaul; R E Glasgow; C Gustafson
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 3.634

7.  Matching health messages to monitor-blunter coping styles to motivate screening mammography.

Authors:  Pamela Williams-Piehota; Judith Pizarro; Tamera R Schneider; Linda Mowad; Peter Salovey
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.267

8.  Understanding how people process health information: a comparison of tailored and nontailored weight-loss materials.

Authors:  M W Kreuter; F C Bull; E M Clark; D L Oswald
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.267

9.  Improving dietary behavior: the effectiveness of tailored messages in primary care settings.

Authors:  M K Campbell; B M DeVellis; V J Strecher; A S Ammerman; R F DeVellis; R S Sandler
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Need for cognition and message complexity in motivating fruit and vegetable intake among callers to the cancer information service.

Authors:  Pamela Williams-Piehota; Judith Pizarro; Stephanie A Navarro Silvera; Linda Mowad; Peter Salovey
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2006
View more
  23 in total

1.  Why are Tailored Messages More Effective? A Multiple Mediation Analysis of a Breast Cancer Screening Intervention.

Authors:  Jakob D Jensen; Andy J King; Nicholas Carcioppolo; LaShara Davis
Journal:  J Commun       Date:  2012-10

2.  Promoting fruit and vegetable intake through messages tailored to individual differences in regulatory focus.

Authors:  Amy E Latimer; Pamela Williams-Piehota; Nicole A Katulak; Ashley Cox; Linda Mowad; E Tory Higgins; Peter Salovey
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2008-08-01

3.  A Field Experiment Testing the Utility of Regulatory Fit Messages for Promoting Physical Activity.

Authors:  Amy E Latimer; Susan E Rivers; Tara A Rench; Nicole A Katulak; Althea Hicks; Julie Keany Hodorowski; E Tory Higgins; Peter Salovey
Journal:  J Exp Soc Psychol       Date:  2008-05

4.  Tailoring messages to individual differences in monitoring-blunting styles to increase fruit and vegetable intake.

Authors:  Pamela Williams-Piehota; Amy E Latimer; Nicole A Katulak; Ashley Cox; Stephanie A N Silvera; Linda Mowad; Peter Salovey
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.045

5.  Positive messaging promotes walking in older adults.

Authors:  Nanna Notthoff; Laura L Carstensen
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2014-06

6.  Message framing for health: moderation by perceived susceptibility and motivational orientation in a diverse sample of Americans.

Authors:  John A Updegraff; Cameron Brick; Amber S Emanuel; Roy E Mintzer; David K Sherman
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 4.267

7.  To frame or not to frame? Effects of message framing and risk priming on mouth rinse use and intention in an adult population-based sample.

Authors:  Gert-Jan de Bruijn
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2018-09-21

8.  Influencing Attitudes Toward Near and Distant Objects.

Authors:  Kentaro Fujita; Tal Eyal; Shelly Chaiken; Yaacov Trope; Nira Liberman
Journal:  J Exp Soc Psychol       Date:  2008-11

9.  Approach/Avoidance Motivation, Message Framing, and Health Behavior: Understanding the Congruency Effect.

Authors:  David K Sherman; Traci Mann; John A Updegraff
Journal:  Motiv Emot       Date:  2006-06

10.  Content matters: neuroimaging investigation of brain and behavioral impact of televised anti-tobacco public service announcements.

Authors:  An-Li Wang; Kosha Ruparel; James W Loughead; Andrew A Strasser; Shira J Blady; Kevin G Lynch; Dan Romer; Joseph N Cappella; Caryn Lerman; Daniel D Langleben
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.