Literature DB >> 30242597

To frame or not to frame? Effects of message framing and risk priming on mouth rinse use and intention in an adult population-based sample.

Gert-Jan de Bruijn1.   

Abstract

Good dental hygiene is key to public health. To promote dental hygiene behaviours, persuasive messages are key. Message framing is a popular theory that has seen mixed evidence. In this web-based experimental study, interaction effects of message frame, behavioural function, and risk priming were investigated on mouth rinse use and intentions in a representative sample of Dutch adults. Final included sample contained 549 participants (50.1% male, mean age = 47.4, SD = 16.1) and outcomes were immediate mouth rinse product choice, intentions to use mouth rinse, and mouth rinse behaviour at 2-week follow-up. Results demonstrated a theorized significant interaction between message frame and behavioural function were mouth rinse product choice. Two-week follow-up mouth rinse behaviour was affected by an interaction between message frame and risk prime. Message framing can thus be employed to promote dental health, but it requires attention to moderation effects which are inconsistent across behavioural outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adults; Behaviour; Dental health; Intention; Message framing; Persuasive communication

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30242597     DOI: 10.1007/s10865-018-9972-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Behav Med        ISSN: 0160-7715


  29 in total

1.  Dispositional motivations and message framing: a test of the congruency hypothesis in college students.

Authors:  Traci Mann; David Sherman; John Updegraff
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.267

2.  Oral health, general health and quality of life.

Authors:  Aubrey Sheiham
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 9.408

3.  G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.

Authors:  Franz Faul; Edgar Erdfelder; Albert-Georg Lang; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-05

4.  Message framing for health: moderation by perceived susceptibility and motivational orientation in a diverse sample of Americans.

Authors:  John A Updegraff; Cameron Brick; Amber S Emanuel; Roy E Mintzer; David K Sherman
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 4.267

5.  Unrealistic optimism about susceptibility to health problems: conclusions from a community-wide sample.

Authors:  N D Weinstein
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1987-10

6.  Resistance of personal risk perceptions to debiasing interventions.

Authors:  N D Weinstein; W M Klein
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.267

7.  Does priming a specific illness schema result in an attentional information-processing bias for specific illnesses?

Authors:  Caroline J Henderson; Martin S Hagger; Sheina Orbell
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.267

8.  Does perceived risk influence the effects of message framing? A new investigation of a widely held notion.

Authors:  Jonathan Van 't Riet; Anthony D Cox; Dena Cox; Gregory D Zimet; Gert-Jan De Bruijn; Bas Van den Putte; Hein De Vries; Marieke Q Werrij; Robert A C Ruiter
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2014-03-27

9.  Association between dental health and acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  K J Mattila; M S Nieminen; V V Valtonen; V P Rasi; Y A Kesäniemi; S L Syrjälä; P S Jungell; M Isoluoma; K Hietaniemi; M J Jokinen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-03-25

10.  Health goal priming as a situated intervention tool: how to benefit from nonconscious motivational routes to health behaviour.

Authors:  Esther K Papies
Journal:  Health Psychol Rev       Date:  2016-05-19
View more
  1 in total

1.  The effects of health behaviours and beliefs based on message framing among patients with chronic diseases: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ruitong Gao; Hui Guo; Fei Li; Yandi Liu; Meidi Shen; Linqi Xu; Tianzhuo Yu; Feng Li
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 2.692

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.