Literature DB >> 18951831

Trans-saccadic perception.

David Melcher1, Carol L Colby.   

Abstract

A basic question in cognition is how visual information obtained in separate glances can produce a stable, continuous percept. Previous explanations have included theories such as integration in a trans-saccadic buffer or storage in visual memory, or even that perception begins anew with each fixation. Converging evidence from primate neurophysiology, human psychophysics and neuroimaging indicate an additional explanation: the intention to make a saccadic eye movement leads to a fundamental alteration in visual processing itself before and after the saccadic eye movement. We outline five principles of 'trans-saccadic perception' that could help to explain how it is possible - despite discrete sensory input and limited memory - that conscious perception across saccades seems smooth and predictable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18951831     DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  92 in total

1.  Higher level visual cortex represents retinotopic, not spatiotopic, object location.

Authors:  Julie D Golomb; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Anticipatory saccade target processing and the presaccadic transfer of visual features.

Authors:  Marc Zirnsak; Ricarda G K Gerhards; Roozbeh Kiani; Markus Lappe; Fred H Hamker
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Remapping of the line motion illusion across eye movements.

Authors:  David Melcher; Alessio Fracasso
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-04       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Saccades elicit obligatory allocation of visual working memory.

Authors:  Na Shao; Jie Li; Rende Shui; Xiaojie Zheng; Jiangang Lu; Mowei Shen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-07

5.  Predictive remapping of attention across eye movements.

Authors:  Martin Rolfs; Donatas Jonikaitis; Heiner Deubel; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-26       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Perceptual learning beyond retinotopic reference frame.

Authors:  En Zhang; Wu Li
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Memory and prediction in natural gaze control.

Authors:  Gabriel Diaz; Joseph Cooper; Mary Hayhoe
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  The effect of saccade metrics on the corollary discharge contribution to perceived eye location.

Authors:  Sonia Bansal; Laurence C Jayet Bray; Matthew S Peterson; Wilsaan M Joiner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Eye movements reset visual perception.

Authors:  Michael A Paradiso; Dar Meshi; Jordan Pisarcik; Samuel Levine
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  A (fascinating) litmus test for human retino- vs. non-retinotopic processing.

Authors:  Marco Boi; Haluk Oğmen; Joseph Krummenacher; Thomas U Otto; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.