Literature DB >> 22159103

Anticipatory saccade target processing and the presaccadic transfer of visual features.

Marc Zirnsak1, Ricarda G K Gerhards, Roozbeh Kiani, Markus Lappe, Fred H Hamker.   

Abstract

As we shift our gaze to explore the visual world, information enters cortex in a sequence of successive snapshots, interrupted by phases of blur. Our experience, in contrast, appears like a movie of a continuous stream of objects embedded in a stable world. This perception of stability across eye movements has been linked to changes in spatial sensitivity of visual neurons anticipating the upcoming saccade, often referred to as shifting receptive fields (Duhamel et al., 1992; Walker et al., 1995; Umeno and Goldberg, 1997; Nakamura and Colby, 2002). How exactly these receptive field dynamics contribute to perceptual stability is currently not clear. Anticipatory receptive field shifts toward the future, postsaccadic position may bridge the transient perisaccadic epoch (Sommer and Wurtz, 2006; Wurtz, 2008; Melcher and Colby, 2008). Alternatively, a presaccadic shift of receptive fields toward the saccade target area (Tolias et al., 2001) may serve to focus visual resources onto the most relevant objects in the postsaccadic scene (Hamker et al., 2008). In this view, shifts of feature detectors serve to facilitate the processing of the peripheral visual content before it is foveated. While this conception is consistent with previous observations on receptive field dynamics and on perisaccadic compression (Ross et al., 1997; Morrone et al., 1997; Kaiser and Lappe, 2004), it predicts that receptive fields beyond the saccade target shift toward the saccade target rather than in the direction of the saccade. We have tested this prediction in human observers via the presaccadic transfer of the tilt-aftereffect (Melcher, 2007).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22159103      PMCID: PMC6634159          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2465-11.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  31 in total

1.  Eye movements modulate visual receptive fields of V4 neurons.

Authors:  A S Tolias; T Moore; S M Smirnakis; E J Tehovnik; A G Siapas; P H Schiller
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Postsaccadic visual references generate presaccadic compression of space.

Authors:  M Lappe; H Awater; B Krekelberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-02-24       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit.

Authors:  F A Wichmann; N J Hill
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-11

4.  Updating of the visual representation in monkey striate and extrastriate cortex during saccades.

Authors:  Kae Nakamura; Carol L Colby
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Perisaccadic mislocalization orthogonal to saccade direction.

Authors:  Marcus Kaiser; Markus Lappe
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2004-01-22       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Selective gating of visual signals by microstimulation of frontal cortex.

Authors:  Tirin Moore; Katherine M Armstrong
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-01-23       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  The updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements.

Authors:  J R Duhamel; C L Colby; M E Goldberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-01-03       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Dynamic shifts of visual receptive fields in cortical area MT by spatial attention.

Authors:  Thilo Womelsdorf; Katharina Anton-Erxleben; Florian Pieper; Stefan Treue
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-08-13       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Changes in visual receptive fields with microstimulation of frontal cortex.

Authors:  Katherine M Armstrong; Jamie K Fitzgerald; Tirin Moore
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Influence of the thalamus on spatial visual processing in frontal cortex.

Authors:  Marc A Sommer; Robert H Wurtz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  16 in total

1.  The background is remapped across saccades.

Authors:  Oakyoon Cha; Sang Chul Chong
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Compression and suppression of shifting receptive field activity in frontal eye field neurons.

Authors:  Wilsaan M Joiner; James Cavanaugh; Robert H Wurtz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Saccadic remapping of object-selective information.

Authors:  Benjamin A Wolfe; David Whitney
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  An object-mediated updating account of insensitivity to transsaccadic change.

Authors:  A Caglar Tas; Cathleen M Moore; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Presaccadic motion integration between current and future retinotopic locations of attended objects.

Authors:  Martin Szinte; Donatas Jonikaitis; Martin Rolfs; Patrick Cavanagh; Heiner Deubel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Corollary Discharge and Oculomotor Proprioception: Cortical Mechanisms for Spatially Accurate Vision.

Authors:  Linus D Sun; Michael E Goldberg
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 6.422

Review 7.  Saccades and shifting receptive fields: anticipating consequences or selecting targets?

Authors:  Marc Zirnsak; Tirin Moore
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Unmasking saccadic uncrowding.

Authors:  Mehmet N Ağaoğlu; Haluk Öğmen; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Pre-saccadic shifts of visual attention.

Authors:  William J Harrison; Jason B Mattingley; Roger W Remington
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A reinvestigation of the reference frame of the tilt-adaptation aftereffect.

Authors:  Sebastiaan Mathôt; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.