Literature DB >> 18946954

Transfusion management using a remote-controlled, automated blood storage.

Pasqualepaolo Pagliaro1, Rosalia Turdo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Generally, the safety of transfusion terapies for patients depends in part on the distribution of the blood products. The prevention of adverse events can be aided by technological means, which, besides improving the traceability of the process, make errors less likely. In this context, the latest frontier in automation and computerisation is the remote-controlled, automated refrigerator for blood storage.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Computer cross-matching is an efficient and safe method for assigning blood components, based on Information Technology applied to typing and screening. This method can be extended to the management of an automated blood refrigerator, the programme of which is interfaced with the Transfusion Service's information system. The connection we made in our Service between EmoNet and Hemosafe enables real-time, remote-controlled management of the following aspects of blood component distribution: a) release of autologous and allogeneic units already allocated to a patient, b) release of available units, which can be allocated by remote-control to known patients, in the presence of a valid computer cross-match, c) release of O-negative units of blood for emergencies.
RESULTS: Our system combines an information database, which enables computer cross-matching, with an automated refrigerator for blood storage with controlled access managed remotely by the Transfusion Service. The effectiveness and safety of the system were validated during the 4 months of its routine use in the Transfusion Service's outpatient department.
CONCLUSIONS: The safety and efficiency of the distribution of blood products can and must be increased by the use of technological innovations. With the EmoNet/Hemosafe system, the responsibility for the remote-controlled distribution of red blood cell concentrates remains with the chief of the Transfusion Services, through the use of automated computer procedures and supported by continuous training of technicians and nursing staff.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18946954      PMCID: PMC2626845          DOI: 10.2450/2008.0029-06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Transfus        ISSN: 1723-2007            Impact factor:   3.443


  18 in total

Review 1.  Computerization in the transfusion service.

Authors:  Suzanne H Butch
Journal:  Vox Sang       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.144

2.  Emily Cooley Lecture 2002: transfusion safety in the hospital.

Authors:  Walter H Dzik
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.157

3.  Network computer-assisted transfusion-management system for accurate blood component-recipient identification at the bedside.

Authors:  Shigeki Miyata; Takeshi Kawai; Suguru Yamamoto; Masahiro Takada; Yasuyuki Iwatani; Osamu Uchida; Hideaki Imanaka; Kazuhiro Sase; Toshikatsu Yagihara; Masakazu Kuro
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.157

4.  Frequency of delayed hemolytic transfusion reactions following antibody screening and immediate-spin crossmatching.

Authors:  P H Pinkerton; A S Coovadia; J Goldstein
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.157

5.  Error in medicine.

Authors:  L L Leape
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-12-21       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  The maximum surgical blood order schedule and surgical blood use in the United States.

Authors:  B A Friedman; H A Oberman; A R Chadwick; K I Kingdon
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  1976 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 7.  Transfusion recipient identification.

Authors:  P Pagliaro; P Rebulla
Journal:  Vox Sang       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.144

8.  Pretransfusion testing without serologic crossmatch: approaches to ensure patient safety.

Authors:  M Kuriyan; E Fox
Journal:  Vox Sang       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.144

Review 9.  Patient safety and blood transfusion: new solutions.

Authors:  Walter H Dzik; Howard Corwin; Lawrence Tim Goodnough; Martha Higgins; Harold Kaplan; Michael Murphy; Paul Ness; Ira A Shulman; Rosyln Yomtovian
Journal:  Transfus Med Rev       Date:  2003-07

10.  Electronic verification of donor-recipient compatibility: the computer crossmatch.

Authors:  S H Butch; W J Judd; E A Steiner; M Stoe; H A Oberman
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.157

View more
  3 in total

1.  Blood transfusion practice: a nationwide survey in Italy.

Authors:  Franco Verlicchi; Giuseppina Facco; Michela Macrì; Stefano Antoncecchi; Pietro Bonomo
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 3.443

2.  The use of telemedicine in Italian Blood Banks: a nationwide survey.

Authors:  Pierluigi Berti; Franco Verlicchi; Francesco Fiorin; Roberto Guaschino; Adelio Cangemi
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 3.443

3.  Virtual blood bank.

Authors:  Kit Fai Wong
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2011-01-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.