M Kuriyan1, E Fox. 1. Transfusion Services, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA. Kuriyame@umdnj.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A crossmatch is usual in pretransfusion testing, but we eliminated it at our tertiary care university hospital. In place of the crossmatch, we have introduced a system where, if an antibody screen is negative, two technologists confirm the ABO of the same patient sample, and we release blood of the patient's type without a serologic or electronic crossmatch. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 65,628 samples received for pretransfusion testing, we studied the effect of common errors that occur from the time of receipt of a sample until release of the blood unit, in order to decide if elimination of the serologic crossmatch would affect patient safety. All sample labels were inspected for acceptability. RESULTS: A total of 1,082 (1.64%) samples were rejected for mislabeling. Discordance in patient ABO typing results between two technologists was 0.43%. Such discrepancies were resolved before the release of blood units. No donor unit mislabeling or unit release errors were detected. CONCLUSION: Elimination of the crossmatch for red cell antibody-negative patients is safe provided a system of error detection is used. This enhances patient care through the quicker release of blood, increased laboratory efficiency and decreased costs.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A crossmatch is usual in pretransfusion testing, but we eliminated it at our tertiary care university hospital. In place of the crossmatch, we have introduced a system where, if an antibody screen is negative, two technologists confirm the ABO of the same patient sample, and we release blood of the patient's type without a serologic or electronic crossmatch. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 65,628 samples received for pretransfusion testing, we studied the effect of common errors that occur from the time of receipt of a sample until release of the blood unit, in order to decide if elimination of the serologic crossmatch would affect patient safety. All sample labels were inspected for acceptability. RESULTS: A total of 1,082 (1.64%) samples were rejected for mislabeling. Discordance in patientABO typing results between two technologists was 0.43%. Such discrepancies were resolved before the release of blood units. No donor unit mislabeling or unit release errors were detected. CONCLUSION: Elimination of the crossmatch for red cell antibody-negative patients is safe provided a system of error detection is used. This enhances patient care through the quicker release of blood, increased laboratory efficiency and decreased costs.
Authors: Geet Aggarwal; Aseem K Tiwari; Dinesh Arora; Ravi C Dara; Devi P Acharya; Gunjan Bhardwaj; Jyoti Sharma Journal: Asian J Transfus Sci Date: 2018 Jan-Jun