Literature DB >> 10765147

Pretransfusion testing without serologic crossmatch: approaches to ensure patient safety.

M Kuriyan1, E Fox.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A crossmatch is usual in pretransfusion testing, but we eliminated it at our tertiary care university hospital. In place of the crossmatch, we have introduced a system where, if an antibody screen is negative, two technologists confirm the ABO of the same patient sample, and we release blood of the patient's type without a serologic or electronic crossmatch.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 65,628 samples received for pretransfusion testing, we studied the effect of common errors that occur from the time of receipt of a sample until release of the blood unit, in order to decide if elimination of the serologic crossmatch would affect patient safety. All sample labels were inspected for acceptability.
RESULTS: A total of 1,082 (1.64%) samples were rejected for mislabeling. Discordance in patient ABO typing results between two technologists was 0.43%. Such discrepancies were resolved before the release of blood units. No donor unit mislabeling or unit release errors were detected.
CONCLUSION: Elimination of the crossmatch for red cell antibody-negative patients is safe provided a system of error detection is used. This enhances patient care through the quicker release of blood, increased laboratory efficiency and decreased costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10765147     DOI: 10.1159/000031160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vox Sang        ISSN: 0042-9007            Impact factor:   2.144


  4 in total

1.  Transfusion management using a remote-controlled, automated blood storage.

Authors:  Pasqualepaolo Pagliaro; Rosalia Turdo
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.443

2.  Advantages of type and screen policy: Perspective from a developing country!

Authors:  Geet Aggarwal; Aseem K Tiwari; Dinesh Arora; Ravi C Dara; Devi P Acharya; Gunjan Bhardwaj; Jyoti Sharma
Journal:  Asian J Transfus Sci       Date:  2018 Jan-Jun

3.  Type and screen method and Coombs crossmatch method for pretransfusion testing: A prospective comparative study in a tertiary care hospital in Delhi.

Authors:  K Devi Anu; Sangeeta Pahuja; Geetika Sharma
Journal:  Asian J Transfus Sci       Date:  2022-05-26

4.  Benefits of VISION Max automated cross-matching in comparison with manual cross-matching: A multidimensional analysis.

Authors:  Hee-Jung Chung; Mina Hur; Sang Gyeu Choi; Hyun-Kyung Lee; Seungho Lee; Hanah Kim; Hee-Won Moon; Yeo-Min Yun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.