Literature DB >> 21952793

Comparison between Gelfoam packing and no packing after endoscopic sinus surgery in the same patients.

Jee Hye Wee1, Chul Hee Lee, Chae Seo Rhee, Jeong-Whun Kim.   

Abstract

After functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS), nasal packing may be necessary and a packing material which has benefits in both cost and efficacy would be required. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of Gelfoam packing on hemostasis and wound healing after FESS. Patients who underwent bilateral FESS due to chronic bilateral rhinosinusitis were enrolled. Randomly, one side was selected for Gelfoam packing and the other side for no packing. Subjective symptoms and objective findings such as synechia, granulation, pus discharge, edema, stenosis, and crust were evaluated. A total of 21 patients (17 men and 4 women; mean age 39.7 years ranging from 12 to 75 years) were included. There were no statistical significant differences between two groups regarding both subjective symptoms and objective findings during 4 months after surgery. Three patients had postoperative bleeding in the no packing side. Gelfoam packing may be recommendable in terms of efficacy and cost-benefit after FESS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21952793     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-011-1768-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  18 in total

1.  Silastic and gelatin film sheeting in tympanoplasty.

Authors:  J Falbe-Hansen; M Tos
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1975 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.547

2.  Packing in endoscopic sinus surgery: is it really required?

Authors:  Ron Eliashar; Menachem Gross; Jay Wohlgelernter; Jean-Yves Sichel
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 3.  Advances in absorbable biomaterials and nasal packing.

Authors:  Rowan Valentine; Peter-John Wormald; Raj Sindwani
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.346

4.  Effect of microporous polysaccharide hemospheres (MPH) on bleeding after endoscopic sinus surgery: randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Jastin L Antisdel; Jackie L West-Denning; Raj Sindwani
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.497

5.  Is nasal packing necessary following endoscopic sinus surgery?

Authors:  Richard R Orlandi; Donald C Lanza
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Control of bleeding following functional endoscopic sinus surgery using carboxy-methylated cellulose packing.

Authors:  Konrad G Kastl; Christian S Betz; Vanessa Siedek; Andreas Leunig
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Effects of nonabsorbable packing in middle meatus after sinus surgery.

Authors:  Vegard Bugten; Ståle Nordgård; Eirik Skogvoll; Sverre Steinsvåg
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Nasal packing after routine nasal surgery--is it justified?

Authors:  M von Schoenberg; P Robinson; R Ryan
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 1.469

9.  Evaluation of Surgicel Nu-knit, Merocel and Vasolene gauze nasal packs: a randomized trial.

Authors:  C A Shinkwin; N Beasley; R Simo; L Rushton; N S Jones
Journal:  Rhinology       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.681

10.  A gelatin-thrombin matrix for hemostasis after endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  Bradford A Woodworth; Rakesh K Chandra; Jeffrey D LeBenger; Bogdan Ilie; Rodney J Schlosser
Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-06-16       Impact factor: 1.808

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Comprehensive review on endonasal endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  Rainer K Weber; Werner Hosemann
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-12-22

2.  Efficacy of hyaluronic acid and hydroxyethyl starch in preventing adhesion following endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  Su-Jong Kim; Jae-Min Shin; Eun Jung Lee; Il-Ho Park; Heung-Man Lee; Kyung-Su Kim
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Comparative analysis of Cutanplast and Spongostan nasal packing after endoscopic sinus surgery: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study.

Authors:  Kyu-Sup Cho; Chan-Hwi Park; Sung-Lyong Hong; Min-Jung Kim; Joo-Yeon Kim; Yong-Wan Kim; Soo-Kweon Koo; Hwan-Jung Roh
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Clinical benefits of polyurethane nasal packing in endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  Zalan Piski; Imre Gerlinger; Nelli Nepp; Peter Revesz; Andras Burian; Kornelia Farkas; Laszlo Lujber
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Antibodies directed against integration host factor mediate biofilm clearance from Nasopore.

Authors:  Kathleyn A Brandstetter; Joseph A Jurcisek; Steven D Goodman; Lauren O Bakaletz; Subinoy Das
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 6.  How effective is postoperative packing in FESS patients? A critical analysis of published interventional studies.

Authors:  Petros V Vlastarakos; Emily Iacovou; Melina Fetta; Marios Tapis; Thomas P Nikolopoulos
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-12-26       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 7.  Absorbable and nonabsorbable packing after functional endoscopic sinus surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes.

Authors:  Tang-Chuan Wang; Chih-Jaan Tai; Yung-An Tsou; Li-Tai Tsai; Yu-Fen Li; Ming-Hsui Tsai
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 8.  Biodegradable nasal packings for endoscopic sinonasal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maoxiao Yan; Dandan Zheng; Ying Li; Qiaoli Zheng; Jia Chen; Beibei Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Hot saline irrigation in comparison to nasal packing after sinus surgery.

Authors:  Axel Nordström; Mattias Jangard; Marie Svedberg; Helena Kullenberg; Michael Ryott; Maria Kumlin
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-11-10

Review 10.  Current and Alternative Therapies for Nasal Mucosa Injury: A Review.

Authors:  Jegadevswari Selvarajah; Aminuddin Bin Saim; Ruszymah Bt Hj Idrus; Yogeswaran Lokanathan
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-01-12       Impact factor: 5.923

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.