Literature DB >> 18945572

Improving informed consent to chemotherapy: a randomized controlled trial of written information versus an interactive multimedia CD-ROM.

Ian N Olver1, Hayley S Whitford, Linley A Denson, Melissa J Peterson, Scott I Olver.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This randomized controlled trial aimed to determine whether an interactive CD-ROM improved cancer patients' recall of chemotherapy treatment information over standard written information, and whether demographic, cognitive, and psychological factors better predicted recall than this format of delivery.
METHODS: One-hundred-and-one new patients about to commence chemotherapy were randomized to receive written information or a CD-ROM containing treatment information before giving informed consent. Patients' recall, concentration, short-term memory, reading comprehension, anxiety, depression, and coping styles were assessed with standardized measures pre-treatment. Seventy-seven patients completed tests for recall of treatment information before their second chemotherapy session.
RESULTS: Intention-to-treat analyses indicated no significant differences between the written information and CD-ROM groups across recall questions about number of drugs received (p=.43), treatment length (p=.23), and treatment goal (p=.69). Binary logistic regressions indicated that for groups combined different variables predicted each of the recall questions.
CONCLUSION: An interactive CD-ROM did not improve cancer patients' recall of treatment information enough to warrant changes in consent procedures. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Different variables predicted recall of different treatment aspects highlighting the complex nature of attempting to improve patient recall. Attending to the effect of depression on patient knowledge and understanding appears paramount.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18945572     DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.08.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  14 in total

1.  "Entering a Clinical Trial: Is it Right for You?": a randomized study of The Clinical Trials Video and its impact on the informed consent process.

Authors:  Brianna Hoffner; Susan Bauer-Wu; Suzanne Hitchcock-Bryan; Mark Powell; Andrew Wolanski; Steven Joffe
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 2.  Interventions to improve patient comprehension in informed consent for medical and surgical procedures: a systematic review.

Authors:  Yael Schenker; Alicia Fernandez; Rebecca Sudore; Dean Schillinger
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  A classification of errors in lay comprehension of medical documents.

Authors:  Alla Keselman; Catherine Arnott Smith
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 6.317

4.  Do undergraduate student research participants read psychological research consent forms? Examining memory effects, condition effects, and individual differences.

Authors:  Eric R Pedersen; Clayton Neighbors; Judy Tidwell; Ty Lostutter
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2011-07-14

5.  Innovating consent for pediatric HCT patients.

Authors:  J Platt; D B Thiel; S L R Kardia; S W Choi
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 5.483

6.  The perceptions of Australian oncologists about cognitive changes in cancer survivors.

Authors:  Kate Smidt; Lynette Mackenzie; Haryana Dhillon; Janette Vardy; Joanne Lewis; Siew Yim Loh
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Racial/Ethnic Differences in Comprehension of Biospecimen Collection: a Nationwide University of Rochester Cancer Center NCI Community Oncology Research Program Study.

Authors:  Matthew Asare; Charles E Heckler; Eva Culakova; Charles S Kamen; Amber S Kleckner; Lori M Minasian; David S Wendler; Michelle Feige; Carol J Weil; Joan Long; Sharon K Cole; Adedayo A Onitilo; Luke J Peppone; Gary R Morrow; Michelle C Janelsins
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  A stakeholder-driven approach to improve the informed consent process for palliative chemotherapy.

Authors:  Andrea C Enzinger; Jennifer K Wind; Elizabeth Frank; Nadine J McCleary; Laura Porter; Heather Cushing; Caroline Abbott; Christine Cronin; Peter C Enzinger; Neal J Meropol; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2017-03-22

9.  The impact of receiving treatment for cancer at a large metropolitan teaching hospital as recorded by patients using unstructured journals.

Authors:  Ian N Olver; Jaklin A Eliott; Leslye Long; Michele McKinnon; Graham Rumsby
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.037

10.  Effectiveness of a Multimedia Educational Intervention to Improve Understanding of the Risks and Benefits of Palliative Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Andrea C Enzinger; Hajime Uno; Nadine McCleary; Elizabeth Frank; Hanna Sanoff; Katherine Van Loon; Khalid Matin; Andrea Bullock; Christine Cronin; Heather Cibotti; Janet Bagley; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 31.777

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.