Literature DB >> 18941858

Which approach for total hip arthroplasty: anterolateral or posterior?

Jeya Palan1, David J Beard, David W Murray, J G Andrew, John Nolan.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The best approach to use when performing THA is controversial. We did a prospective, nonrandomized multicenter study of 1089 THAs to evaluate patient-centered hip scores and dislocation and revision rates when comparing anterolateral and posterior hip approaches at 5 years' followup. Patients were divided into two groups depending on which surgical approach was used: anterolateral or posterior. The primary outcome measure was change in Oxford hip score. At 5 years, there were no differences in change in Oxford hip score and in dislocation or revision rates between the groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18941858      PMCID: PMC2628526          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0560-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  33 in total

1.  Influence of surgical approach on dislocations after Charnley hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  U Hedlundh; C H Hybbinette; H Fredin
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Total hip prostheses.

Authors:  M E Müller
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1970 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The transgluteal approach to the hip joint.

Authors:  R Bauer; F Kerschbaumer; S Poisel; W Oberthaler
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1979-10

4.  Abductor function after total hip replacement. An electromyographic and clinical review.

Authors:  A S Baker; V C Bitounis
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1989-01

5.  Comparison of measures to assess outcomes in total hip replacement surgery.

Authors:  J Dawson; R Fitzpatrick; D Murray; A Carr
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1996-06

6.  A comparison of the posterolateral and anterolateral approaches to total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  J M Roberts; F H Fu; E J McClain; A B Ferguson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1984 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Early outcome of total hip arthroplasty using the direct lateral vs the posterior surgical approach.

Authors:  T C Barber; D J Roger; S B Goodman; D J Schurman
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.390

8.  A comparison of the anterolateral, transtrochanteric, and posterior surgical approaches in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  A J Vicar; C R Coleman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  R Y Woo; B F Morrey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Anterolateral compared to posterior approach in total hip arthroplasty: differences in component positioning, hip strength, and hip motion.

Authors:  D R Gore; M P Murray; S B Sepic; G M Gardner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  24 in total

1.  Anterior and Anterolateral Approaches for THA Are Associated With Lower Dislocation Risk Without Higher Revision Risk.

Authors:  Dhiren Sheth; Guy Cafri; Maria C S Inacio; Elizabeth W Paxton; Robert S Namba
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  The role of ultrasound in the assessment of post-operative complications following hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  H Douis; D J Dunlop; A M Pearson; J N O'Hara; S L J James
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  Total hip arthroplasty for the management of hip fracture: A review of the literature.

Authors:  Jacob B Stirton; Jacob C Maier; Sumon Nandi
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-02-26

4.  New method for measuring acetabular component positioning with EOS imaging: feasibility study on dry bone.

Authors:  Alexandre Journé; Jérome Sadaka; Claire Bélicourt; Alain Sautet
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  MR imaging of soft tissue alterations after total hip arthroplasty: comparison of classic surgical approaches.

Authors:  Christoph A Agten; Reto Sutter; Claudio Dora; Christian W A Pfirrmann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Do Stem Design and Surgical Approach Influence Early Aseptic Loosening in Cementless THA?

Authors:  Loes Janssen; Karolina A P Wijnands; Dennis Janssen; Michiel W H E Janssen; Jan W Morrenhof
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  [Hip replacement in patients with neuromuscular disorders].

Authors:  L Renner; V Drwal; F Boettner
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Does surgical approach influence mid- to long-term patient-reported outcomes after primary total hip replacement? A comparison of the 3 main surgical approaches.

Authors:  Romain Galmiche; Stéphane Poitras; Johanna Dobransky; Paul R Kim; Robert J Feibel; Wade Gofton; Hesham Abdelbary; Paul E Beaulé
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 2.089

9.  Total hip arthroplasty using a combined anterior and posterior approach via a lateral incision in patients with ankylosed hips.

Authors:  Jian Li; Zhiwei Wang; Ming Li; Yuesong Wu; Weidong Xu; Zimin Wang
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.089

10.  Heterotopic ossification after hemiarthroplasty of the hip - A comparison of three common approaches.

Authors:  Chad M Corrigan; Sarah E Greenberg; Vasanth Sathiyakumar; Phillip M Mitchell; Arie Francis; Adan Omar; Rachel V Thakore; William T Obremskey; Manish K Sethi
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2014-12-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.