Literature DB >> 18940772

Sleeping gulls monitor the vigilance behaviour of their neighbours.

Guy Beauchamp1.   

Abstract

Individuals in groups are often thought to scan their surroundings for threats independently of one another. Models, however, suggest that foragers should monitor the vigilance level of their neighbours to prevent cheating, and to gather information about incipient predation risk. Evidence for monitoring of vigilance is scant. Here, I examined changes in vigilance levels in sleeping gulls (Larus sp.) surrounded by neighbours in various states of alertness. Controlling for group size and neighbour density, gulls interrupted sleep more often to scan their surroundings, and were therefore more vigilant, when their neighbours were alert rather than sleeping or preening. The results provide evidence for copying of vigilance within groups of birds, suggesting a complex flow of information about predation risk in groups.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18940772      PMCID: PMC2657747          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  6 in total

1.  Predicting flock vigilance from simple passerine interactions: modelling with cellular automata.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 2.  Public information: from nosy neighbors to cultural evolution.

Authors:  Etienne Danchin; Luc-Alain Giraldeau; Thomas J Valone; Richard H Wagner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-07-23       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Predator vigilance and group size in mammals and birds: a critical review of the empirical evidence.

Authors:  M A Elgar
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  1989-02

Review 4.  Costs and benefits of within-group spatial position: a feeding competition model.

Authors:  Ben T Hirsch
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.875

5.  Prey synchronize their vigilant behaviour with other group members.

Authors:  Olivier Pays; Pierre-Cyril Renaud; Patrice Loisel; Maud Petit; Jean-François Gerard; Peter J Jarman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  On the advantages of flocking.

Authors:  H R Pulliam
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1973-02       Impact factor: 2.691

  6 in total
  14 in total

1.  Negotiation may lead selfish individuals to cooperate: the example of the collective vigilance game.

Authors:  Etienne Sirot
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Negotiating a stable solution for vigilance behaviour.

Authors:  Andrew N Radford; Tim W Fawcett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  New perspectives in gaze sensitivity research.

Authors:  Gabrielle L Davidson; Nicola S Clayton
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  The value of constant surveillance in a risky environment.

Authors:  M B V Bell; A N Radford; R Rose; H M Wade; A R Ridley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Interactions among social monitoring, anti-predator vigilance and group size in eastern grey kangaroos.

Authors:  François-René Favreau; Anne W Goldizen; Olivier Pays
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Self-improvement for team-players: the effects of individual effort on aggregated group information.

Authors:  Sean A Rands
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Behavioural synchrony between fallow deer Dama dama is related to spatial proximity.

Authors:  Zoe E Hoyle; Rosie A Miller; Sean A Rands
Journal:  BMC Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-06

8.  Coordination and synchronisation of anti-predation vigilance in two crane species.

Authors:  Chen Ge; Guy Beauchamp; Zhongqiu Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Sleeping birds do not respond to predator odour.

Authors:  Luisa Amo; Samuel P Caro; Marcel E Visser
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  To eat and not be eaten: modelling resources and safety in multi-species animal groups.

Authors:  Umesh Srinivasan; Suhel Quader
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.