Stephane Flibotte1, Donald G Moerman. 1. Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada. sflibotte@bcgsc.ca
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Microarray comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) is currently one of the most powerful techniques to measure DNA copy number in large genomes. In humans, microarray CGH is widely used to assess copy number variants in healthy individuals and copy number aberrations associated with various diseases, syndromes and disease susceptibility. In model organisms such as Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) the technique has been applied to detect mutations, primarily deletions, in strains of interest. Although various constraints on oligonucleotide properties have been suggested to minimize non-specific hybridization and improve the data quality, there have been few experimental validations for CGH experiments. For genomic regions where strict design filters would limit the coverage it would also be useful to quantify the expected loss in data quality associated with relaxed design criteria. RESULTS: We have quantified the effects of filtering various oligonucleotide properties by measuring the resolving power for detecting deletions in the human and C. elegans genomes using NimbleGen microarrays. Approximately twice as many oligonucleotides are typically required to be affected by a deletion in human DNA samples in order to achieve the same statistical confidence as one would observe for a deletion in C. elegans. Surprisingly, the ability to detect deletions strongly depends on the oligonucleotide 15-mer count, which is defined as the sum of the genomic frequency of all the constituent 15-mers within the oligonucleotide. A similarity level above 80% to non-target sequences over the length of the probe produces significant cross-hybridization. We recommend the use of a fairly large melting temperature window of up to 10 degrees C, the elimination of repeat sequences, the elimination of homopolymers longer than 5 nucleotides, and a threshold of -1 kcal/mol on the oligonucleotide self-folding energy. We observed very little difference in data quality when varying the oligonucleotide length between 50 and 70, and even when using an isothermal design strategy. CONCLUSION: We have determined experimentally the effects of varying several key oligonucleotide microarray design criteria for detection of deletions in C. elegans and humans with NimbleGen's CGH technology. Our oligonucleotide design recommendations should be applicable for CGH analysis in most species.
BACKGROUND: Microarray comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) is currently one of the most powerful techniques to measure DNA copy number in large genomes. In humans, microarray CGH is widely used to assess copy number variants in healthy individuals and copy number aberrations associated with various diseases, syndromes and disease susceptibility. In model organisms such as Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) the technique has been applied to detect mutations, primarily deletions, in strains of interest. Although various constraints on oligonucleotide properties have been suggested to minimize non-specific hybridization and improve the data quality, there have been few experimental validations for CGH experiments. For genomic regions where strict design filters would limit the coverage it would also be useful to quantify the expected loss in data quality associated with relaxed design criteria. RESULTS: We have quantified the effects of filtering various oligonucleotide properties by measuring the resolving power for detecting deletions in the human and C. elegans genomes using NimbleGen microarrays. Approximately twice as many oligonucleotides are typically required to be affected by a deletion in human DNA samples in order to achieve the same statistical confidence as one would observe for a deletion in C. elegans. Surprisingly, the ability to detect deletions strongly depends on the oligonucleotide 15-mer count, which is defined as the sum of the genomic frequency of all the constituent 15-mers within the oligonucleotide. A similarity level above 80% to non-target sequences over the length of the probe produces significant cross-hybridization. We recommend the use of a fairly large melting temperature window of up to 10 degrees C, the elimination of repeat sequences, the elimination of homopolymers longer than 5 nucleotides, and a threshold of -1 kcal/mol on the oligonucleotide self-folding energy. We observed very little difference in data quality when varying the oligonucleotide length between 50 and 70, and even when using an isothermal design strategy. CONCLUSION: We have determined experimentally the effects of varying several key oligonucleotide microarray design criteria for detection of deletions in C. elegans and humans with NimbleGen's CGH technology. Our oligonucleotide design recommendations should be applicable for CGH analysis in most species.
Authors: Giulia C Kennedy; Hajime Matsuzaki; Shoulian Dong; Wei-min Liu; Jing Huang; Guoying Liu; Xing Su; Manqiu Cao; Wenwei Chen; Jane Zhang; Weiwei Liu; Geoffrey Yang; Xiaojun Di; Thomas Ryder; Zhijun He; Urvashi Surti; Michael S Phillips; Michael T Boyce-Jacino; Stephen P A Fodor; Keith W Jones Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2003-09-07 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Rui Mei; Earl Hubbell; Stefan Bekiranov; Mike Mittmann; Fred C Christians; Mei-Mei Shen; Gang Lu; Joy Fang; Wei-Min Liu; Tom Ryder; Paul Kaplan; David Kulp; Teresa A Webster Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2003-09-19 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: A John Iafrate; Lars Feuk; Miguel N Rivera; Marc L Listewnik; Patricia K Donahoe; Ying Qi; Stephen W Scherer; Charles Lee Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2004-08-01 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Jennifer L Freeman; George H Perry; Lars Feuk; Richard Redon; Steven A McCarroll; David M Altshuler; Hiroyuki Aburatani; Keith W Jones; Chris Tyler-Smith; Matthew E Hurles; Nigel P Carter; Stephen W Scherer; Charles Lee Journal: Genome Res Date: 2006-06-29 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Richard Redon; Shumpei Ishikawa; Karen R Fitch; Lars Feuk; George H Perry; T Daniel Andrews; Heike Fiegler; Michael H Shapero; Andrew R Carson; Wenwei Chen; Eun Kyung Cho; Stephanie Dallaire; Jennifer L Freeman; Juan R González; Mònica Gratacòs; Jing Huang; Dimitrios Kalaitzopoulos; Daisuke Komura; Jeffrey R MacDonald; Christian R Marshall; Rui Mei; Lyndal Montgomery; Kunihiro Nishimura; Kohji Okamura; Fan Shen; Martin J Somerville; Joelle Tchinda; Armand Valsesia; Cara Woodwark; Fengtang Yang; Junjun Zhang; Tatiana Zerjal; Jane Zhang; Lluis Armengol; Donald F Conrad; Xavier Estivill; Chris Tyler-Smith; Nigel P Carter; Hiroyuki Aburatani; Charles Lee; Keith W Jones; Stephen W Scherer; Matthew E Hurles Journal: Nature Date: 2006-11-23 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Martijs J Jonker; Wim C de Leeuw; Marino Marinković; Floyd R A Wittink; Han Rauwerda; Oskar Bruning; Wim A Ensink; Ad C Fluit; C H Boel; Mark de Jong; Timo M Breit Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2014-04-25 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Jennifer G Mulle; Viren C Patel; Stephen T Warren; Madhuri R Hegde; David J Cutler; Michael E Zwick Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-03-29 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jonathan G Frye; Rebecca L Lindsey; Gaelle Rondeau; Steffen Porwollik; Fred Long; Michael McClelland; Charlene R Jackson; Mark D Englen; Richard J Meinersmann; Mark E Berrang; Johnnie A Davis; John B Barrett; Jennifer B Turpin; Sutawee N Thitaram; Paula J Fedorka-Cray Journal: Microb Drug Resist Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 3.431
Authors: Cali E Willet; Laura Bunbury-Cruickshank; Diane van Rooy; Georgina Child; Mohammad R Shariflou; Peter C Thomson; Claire M Wade Journal: BMC Bioinformatics Date: 2013-07-22 Impact factor: 3.169