Literature DB >> 18938055

Titanium clip placement to allow accurate tumour bed localisation following breast conserving surgery: audit on behalf of the IMPORT Trial Management Group.

C E Coles1, C B Wilson, J Cumming, J R Benson, P Forouhi, J S Wilkinson, R Jena, G C Wishart.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Accurate tumour bed (TB) localisation is a key requirement for the UK IMPORT (Intensity Modulated Partial Organ Radiotherapy) trial. We audited the value of titanium clips for TB localisation following breast conserving surgery (BCS) in breast radiotherapy (RT) planning. PATIENTS AND METHODS: At surgery, paired clips were positioned around the TB as follows: 1. Medial, lateral, superior and inferior: half-way between skin and fascia; 2. Posterior: at the pectoral fascia; 3. Anterior: close to the suture line. Thirty consecutive patients with clips inserted were audited at the time of RT planning. Audit standards were set as follows: (i) 5/6 pairs of clips identified on RT planning computed tomography (CT) scan - 100%; (ii) possible clip migration: <10%; (iii) TB localisation improved with clips: >50%. Inter- and intra-observer variability in clinician outlining of the TB was studied in a subset of 12 randomly selected patients to see if this impacted on positioning of radiotherapy field borders.
RESULTS: Five or six pairs of clips were identified in all 30 cases. The TB could be successfully identified using CT seroma alone in only 8/30 (27%) patients. Clips were essential for the TB localisation of the other 22/30 (73%) patients. There was no evidence of clip migration. TB localisation led to modified RT field borders in 18/30 (60%) patients. Five of these patients had highly visible seromas, so the addition of clips modified field borders in 13/30 (43%) patients. Both inter- and intra-observer variability was reasonable and did not impact on positioning of radiotherapy field borders.
CONCLUSION: Titanium clips provide an accurate and reliable method of TB localisation following BCS. We anticipate that the audit results will lead to clips being adopted as best practice by the Association of Breast Surgeons (ABS) at BASO (British Association of Surgical Oncology).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18938055     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2008.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  21 in total

1.  A novel algorithm for the morphometric assessment of radiotherapy treatment planning volumes.

Authors:  R Jena; N F Kirkby; K E Burton; A C F Hoole; L T Tan; N G Burnet
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Consensus statement on tumour bed localization for radiation after oncoplastic breast surgery.

Authors:  T Tse; S Knowles; J Bélec; J M Caudrelier; M Lock; M Brackstone; A Arnaout
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Impact of a Novel Bioabsorbable Implant on Radiation Treatment Planning for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Michael J Cross; Gail S Lebovic; Joseph Ross; Scott Jones; Arnold Smith; Steven Harms
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Ultrasonography-guided surgical clip placement for tumor localization in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Inyoung Youn; Seon Hyeong Choi; Shin Ho Kook; Yoon Jung Choi; Chan Heun Park; Yong Lai Park; Dong Hoon Kim
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.588

Review 5.  Partial breast irradiation versus whole breast radiotherapy for early breast cancer.

Authors:  Brigid E Hickey; Margot Lehman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-08-30

6.  The Influence of Treatment Position (Prone vs. Supine) on Clip Displacement, Seroma, Tumor Bed and Partial Breast Target Volumes: Comparative Study.

Authors:  Ferenc Lakosi; Akos Gulyban; Selma Ben-Mustapha Simoni; Paul Viet Nguyen; Séverine Cucchiaro; Laurence Seidel; Levente Janvary; Sophie Nicolas; Peter Vavassis; Philippe Coucke
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 3.201

Review 7.  Recommendations for standardized pathological characterization of residual disease for neoadjuvant clinical trials of breast cancer by the BIG-NABCG collaboration.

Authors:  V Bossuyt; E Provenzano; W F Symmans; J C Boughey; C Coles; G Curigliano; J M Dixon; L J Esserman; G Fastner; T Kuehn; F Peintinger; G von Minckwitz; J White; W Yang; S Badve; C Denkert; G MacGrogan; F Penault-Llorca; G Viale; D Cameron
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  Clinical impact of IMPORT HIGH trial (CRUK/06/003) on breast radiotherapy practices in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Yat Tsang; Laura Ciurlionis; Anna M Kirby; Imogen Locke; Karen Venables; John R Yarnold; Jenny Titley; Judith Bliss; Charlotte E Coles
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Intraoperative marking of the tumour resection surface for improved radiation therapy planning in head and neck cancer: preclinical evaluation of a novel liquid fiducial marker.

Authors:  David Steybe; Maximilian Frederik Russe; Ute Ludwig; Tanja Sprave; Kirstin Vach; Wiebke Semper-Hogg; Rainer Schmelzeisen; Pit Jacob Voss; Philipp Poxleitner
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 2.419

10.  A clip-based protocol for breast boost radiotherapy provides clear target visualisation and demonstrates significant volume reduction over time.

Authors:  Lorraine Lewis; Jennifer Cox; Marita Morgia; John Atyeo; Gillian Lamoury
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2015-06-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.