Literature DB >> 28701531

Differential contributions to the interception of occluded ballistic trajectories by the temporoparietal junction, area hMT/V5+, and the intraparietal cortex.

Sergio Delle Monache1,2,3, Francesco Lacquaniti1,2,3, Gianfranco Bosco4,2,3.   

Abstract

The ability to catch objects when transiently occluded from view suggests their motion can be extrapolated. Intraparietal cortex (IPS) plays a major role in this process along with other brain structures, depending on the task. For example, interception of objects under Earth's gravity effects may depend on time-to-contact predictions derived from integration of visual signals processed by hMT/V5+ with a priori knowledge of gravity residing in the temporoparietal junction (TPJ). To investigate this issue further, we disrupted TPJ, hMT/V5+, and IPS activities with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) while subjects intercepted computer-simulated projectile trajectories perturbed randomly with either hypo- or hypergravity effects. In experiment 1, trajectories were occluded either 750 or 1,250 ms before landing. Three subject groups underwent triple-pulse TMS (tpTMS, 3 pulses at 10 Hz) on one target area (TPJ | hMT/V5+ | IPS) and on the vertex (control site), timed at either trajectory perturbation or occlusion. In experiment 2, trajectories were entirely visible and participants received tpTMS on TPJ and hMT/V5+ with same timing as experiment 1 tpTMS of TPJ, hMT/V5+, and IPS affected differently the interceptive timing. TPJ stimulation affected preferentially responses to 1-g motion, hMT/V5+ all response types, and IPS stimulation induced opposite effects on 0-g and 2-g responses, being ineffective on 1-g responses. Only IPS stimulation was effective when applied after target disappearance, implying this area might elaborate memory representations of occluded target motion. Results are compatible with the idea that IPS, TPJ, and hMT/V5+ contribute to distinct aspects of visual motion extrapolation, perhaps through parallel processing.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Visual extrapolation represents a potential neural solution to afford motor interactions with the environment in the face of missing information. We investigated relative contributions by temporoparietal junction (TPJ), hMT/V5+, and intraparietal cortex (IPS), cortical areas potentially involved in these processes. Parallel organization of visual extrapolation processes emerged with respect to the target's motion causal nature: TPJ was primarily involved for visual motion congruent with gravity effects, IPS for arbitrary visual motion, whereas hMT/V5+ contributed at earlier processing stages.
Copyright © 2017 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gravity; internal model; manual interception; predictive processing; visual motion extrapolation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28701531      PMCID: PMC5596142          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00068.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  87 in total

1.  Dissociation of visual, motor and predictive signals in parietal cortex during visual guidance.

Authors:  E N Eskandar; J A Assad
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Neural substrates of dynamic object occlusion.

Authors:  Sarah M Shuwairi; Clayton E Curtis; Scott P Johnson
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 3.  Behavioral and neurophysiological aspects of target interception.

Authors:  Hugo Merchant; Wilbert Zarco; Luis Prado; Oswaldo Pérez
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.622

4.  Cerebral representations of space and time.

Authors:  M Beudel; R Renken; K L Leenders; B M de Jong
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 5.  Internal models and prediction of visual gravitational motion.

Authors:  Myrka Zago; Joseph McIntyre; Patrice Senot; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Extrapolation of visual motion for manual interception.

Authors:  John F Soechting; Martha Flanders
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Sound-evoked vestibular stimulation affects the anticipation of gravity effects during visual self-motion.

Authors:  Iole Indovina; Elisabetta Mazzarella; Vincenzo Maffei; Benedetta Cesqui; Luca Passamonti; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-05-24       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Encoding of temporal probabilities in the human brain.

Authors:  Domenica Bueti; Bahador Bahrami; Vincent Walsh; Geraint Rees
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Imagery of a moving object: the role of occipital cortex and human MT/V5+.

Authors:  Amanda Kaas; Sarah Weigelt; Alard Roebroeck; Axel Kohler; Lars Muckli
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Catching what we can't see: manual interception of occluded fly-ball trajectories.

Authors:  Gianfranco Bosco; Sergio Delle Monache; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

1.  The role of cortical areas hMT/V5+ and TPJ on the magnitude of representational momentum and representational gravity: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  Nuno Alexandre De Sá Teixeira; Gianfranco Bosco; Sergio Delle Monache; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Resolving visual motion through perceptual gaps.

Authors:  Lina Teichmann; Grace Edwards; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Body orientation contributes to modelling the effects of gravity for target interception in humans.

Authors:  Barbara La Scaleia; Francesco Lacquaniti; Myrka Zago
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Static internal representation of dynamic situations reveals time compaction in human cognition.

Authors:  José Antonio Villacorta-Atienza; Carlos Calvo Tapia; Sergio Díez-Hermano; Abel Sánchez-Jiménez; Sergey Lobov; Nadia Krilova; Antonio Murciano; Gabriela E López-Tolsa; Ricardo Pellón; Valeri A Makarov
Journal:  J Adv Res       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 10.479

Review 5.  Watching the Effects of Gravity. Vestibular Cortex and the Neural Representation of "Visual" Gravity.

Authors:  Sergio Delle Monache; Iole Indovina; Myrka Zago; Elena Daprati; Francesco Lacquaniti; Gianfranco Bosco
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-01

6.  Where is my hand in space? The internal model of gravity influences proprioception.

Authors:  Maria Gallagher; Breanne Kearney; Elisa Raffaella Ferrè
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 3.812

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.