OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of 3 computer-aided surgery systems for maxillofacial reconstruction. DESIGN: Evaluation of 3 computer-aided surgery systems: StealthStation, VectorVision, and Voxim. SETTING: The University of California, Davis, Department of Otolaryngology computer-aided surgery laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Four fresh cadaveric heads. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Mean target registration error. RESULTS: The StealthStation was the most accurate (mean [SD] target registration error, 1.00 [0.04] mm), followed by VectorVision (1.13 [0.05] mm) and then Voxim (1.34 [0.04] mm). All values met statistical significance (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Measurable accuracy differences were found among the navigation systems evaluated. The StealthStation was the most accurate. However, the differences are small, and the clinical significance for maxillofacial reconstruction is negligible.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of 3 computer-aided surgery systems for maxillofacial reconstruction. DESIGN: Evaluation of 3 computer-aided surgery systems: StealthStation, VectorVision, and Voxim. SETTING: The University of California, Davis, Department of Otolaryngology computer-aided surgery laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Four fresh cadaveric heads. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Mean target registration error. RESULTS: The StealthStation was the most accurate (mean [SD] target registration error, 1.00 [0.04] mm), followed by VectorVision (1.13 [0.05] mm) and then Voxim (1.34 [0.04] mm). All values met statistical significance (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Measurable accuracy differences were found among the navigation systems evaluated. The StealthStation was the most accurate. However, the differences are small, and the clinical significance for maxillofacial reconstruction is negligible.
Authors: S Reaungamornrat; Y Otake; A Uneri; S Schafer; D J Mirota; S Nithiananthan; J W Stayman; G Kleinszig; A J Khanna; R H Taylor; J H Siewerdsen Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2012-04-27 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: C Bouchard; J C Magill; V Nikonovskiy; M Byl; B A Murphy; L B Kaban; M J Troulis Journal: Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg Date: 2011-11-21 Impact factor: 2.789
Authors: Zachary S Peacock; John C Magill; Brad J Tricomi; Brian A Murphy; Vladimir Nikonovskiy; Nobuhiko Hata; Laurent Chauvin; Maria J Troulis Journal: J Oral Maxillofac Surg Date: 2015-03-19 Impact factor: 1.895
Authors: J Burgner; A L Simpson; J M Fitzpatrick; R A Lathrop; S D Herrell; M I Miga; R J Webster Journal: Int J Med Robot Date: 2012-07-04 Impact factor: 2.547
Authors: Inês Machado; Matthew Toews; Jie Luo; Prashin Unadkat; Walid Essayed; Elizabeth George; Pedro Teodoro; Herculano Carvalho; Jorge Martins; Polina Golland; Steve Pieper; Sarah Frisken; Alexandra Golby; William Wells Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2018-06-04 Impact factor: 2.924