Literature DB >> 18936149

Predicting progressive glaucomatous optic neuropathy using baseline standard automated perimetry data.

Shaban Demirel1, Brad Fortune, Juanjuan Fan, Richard A Levine, Rodrigo Torres, Hau Nguyen, Steven L Mansberger, Stuart K Gardiner, George A Cioffi, Chris A Johnson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that specific locations and patterns of threshold findings within the visual field have predictive value for progressive glaucomatous optic neuropathy (pGON).
METHODS: Age-adjusted standard automated perimetry thresholds, along with other clinical variables gathered at the initial examination of 168 individuals with high-risk ocular hypertension or early glaucoma, were used as predictors in a classification tree model. The classification variable was a determination of pGON, based on longitudinally gathered stereo optic nerve head photographs. Only data for the worse eye of each individual were included. Data from 100 normal subjects were used to test the specificity of the models.
RESULTS: Classification tree models suggest that patterns of baseline visual field findings are predictive of pGON with sensitivity 65% and specificity 87% on average. Average specificity when data from normal subjects were run on the models was 69%.
CONCLUSIONS: Classification trees can be used to determine which visual field locations are most predictive of poorer prognosis for pGON. Spatial patterns within the visual field convey useable predictive information, in most cases when thresholds are still well within the classically defined normal range.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18936149      PMCID: PMC2759404          DOI: 10.1167/iovs.08-1767

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  32 in total

Review 1.  Ophthalmoscopic evaluation of the optic nerve head.

Authors:  J B Jonas; W M Budde; S Panda-Jonas
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.048

2.  Simulation based analysis of automated, classification of medical images.

Authors:  W Adler; T Hothorn; B Lausen
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.176

3.  Bagging tree classifiers for laser scanning images: a data- and simulation-based strategy.

Authors:  Torsten Hothorn; Berthold Lausen
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.326

4.  Psychophysical investigation of ganglion cell loss in early glaucoma.

Authors:  Paul G D Spry; Chris A Johnson; Steven L Mansberger; George A Cioffi
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Use of progressive glaucomatous optic disk change as the reference standard for evaluation of diagnostic tests in glaucoma.

Authors:  Felipe A Medeiros; Linda M Zangwill; Christopher Bowd; Pamela A Sample; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Risk stratification for in-hospital mortality in acutely decompensated heart failure: classification and regression tree analysis.

Authors:  Gregg C Fonarow; Kirkwood F Adams; William T Abraham; Clyde W Yancy; W John Boscardin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-02-02       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Interobserver and intraobserver variability in the detection of glaucomatous progression of the optic disc.

Authors:  A L Coleman; A Sommer; C Enger; H L Knopf; R L Stamper; D S Minckler
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Appropriate statistical methods to account for similarities in binary outcomes between fellow eyes.

Authors:  J Katz; S Zeger; K Y Liang
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  New glaucoma classification method based on standard Heidelberg Retina Tomograph parameters by bagging classification trees.

Authors:  Christian Y Mardin; Torsten Hothorn; Andrea Peters; Anselm G Jünemann; Nhung X Nguyen; Berthold Lausen
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial.

Authors:  Anders Heijl; M Cristina Leske; Bo Bengtsson; Leslie Hyman; Boel Bengtsson; Mohamed Hussein
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-10
View more
  7 in total

1.  Predicting glaucomatous progression in glaucoma suspect eyes using relevance vector machine classifiers for combined structural and functional measurements.

Authors:  Christopher Bowd; Intae Lee; Michael H Goldbaum; Madhusudhanan Balasubramanian; Felipe A Medeiros; Linda M Zangwill; Christopher A Girkin; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Automated Segmentation Errors When Using Optical Coherence Tomography to Measure Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Glaucoma.

Authors:  Steven L Mansberger; Shivali A Menda; Brad A Fortune; Stuart K Gardiner; Shaban Demirel
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Perception of warble song in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): evidence for special processing.

Authors:  Hsiao-Wei Tu; Robert J Dooling
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 3.084

4.  Perimetric indices as predictors of future glaucomatous functional change.

Authors:  Stuart K Gardiner; Shaban Demirel; Chris A Johnson
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Features of optic disc progression in patients with ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.

Authors:  Michael J Lloyd; Steven L Mansberger; Brad A Fortune; Hau Nguyen; Rodrigo Torres; Shaban Demirel; Stuart K Gardiner; Chris A Johnson; George A Cioffi
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2013 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Detecting glaucomatous change in visual fields: Analysis with an optimization framework.

Authors:  Siamak Yousefi; Michael H Goldbaum; Ehsan S Varnousfaderani; Akram Belghith; Tzyy-Ping Jung; Felipe A Medeiros; Linda M Zangwill; Robert N Weinreb; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Christopher A Girkin; Christopher Bowd
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 6.317

7.  Unsupervised Gaussian Mixture-Model With Expectation Maximization for Detecting Glaucomatous Progression in Standard Automated Perimetry Visual Fields.

Authors:  Siamak Yousefi; Madhusudhanan Balasubramanian; Michael H Goldbaum; Felipe A Medeiros; Linda M Zangwill; Robert N Weinreb; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Christopher A Girkin; Christopher Bowd
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 3.283

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.