Literature DB >> 18931854

Experimental manipulation of psychosocial exposure and questionnaire sensitivity in a simulated manufacturing setting.

Laura H Ikuma1, Kari Babski-Reeves, Maury A Nussbaum.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objectives of this study were to determine the efficacy of experimental manipulations of psychosocial exposures and to evaluate the sensitivity of a psychosocial questionnaire by determining the factors perceived.
METHODS: A 50-item questionnaire was developed from the job content questionnaire (JCQ) and the quality of worklife survey (QWL). The experiment involved simulated work at different physical and psychosocial levels. Forty-eight participants were exposed to two levels of one psychosocial manipulation (job control, job demands, social support, or time pressure).
RESULTS: Significantly different questionnaire responses supported the effectiveness of psychosocial manipulations. Exploratory factor analysis revealed five factors: skill discretion and decision authority, stress level and supervisor support, physical demands, quality of coworker support, and decision-making support.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that psychosocial factors can be manipulated experimentally, and that questionnaires can distinguish perceptions of these factors. These questionnaires may be used to assess perceptions of psychosocial factors in experimental settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18931854     DOI: 10.1007/s00420-008-0364-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health        ISSN: 0340-0131            Impact factor:   3.015


  14 in total

Review 1.  Measurement of psychosocial workplace exposure variables.

Authors:  P Landsbergis; T Theorell; J Schwartz; B A Greiner; N Krause
Journal:  Occup Med       Date:  2000 Jan-Mar

Review 2.  Psychosocial risk factors for neck pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  G A Ariëns; W van Mechelen; P M Bongers; L M Bouter; G van der Wal
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.214

3.  Covariation between workplace physical and psychosocial stressors: evidence and implications for occupational health research and prevention.

Authors:  L A MacDonald; R A Karasek; L Punnett; T Scharf
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2001-06-10       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Further studies of shoulder and neck pain and exposures in customer service work with low biomechanical demands.

Authors:  Kari Anne Holte; Rolf H Westgaard
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2002-10-20       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 5.  Measuring job stressors and strains: where we have been, where we are, and where we need to go.

Authors:  J J Hurrell; D L Nelson; B L Simmons
Journal:  J Occup Health Psychol       Date:  1998-10

6.  Ergonomic stressors and upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders in automobile manufacturing: a one year follow up study.

Authors:  L Punnett; J Gold; J N Katz; R Gore; D H Wegman
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.402

7.  Occupational stress: measuring job pressure and organizational support in the workplace.

Authors:  P R Vagg; C D Spielberger
Journal:  J Occup Health Psychol       Date:  1998-10

8.  The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): an instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics.

Authors:  R Karasek; C Brisson; N Kawakami; I Houtman; P Bongers; B Amick
Journal:  J Occup Health Psychol       Date:  1998-10

9.  Cervicobrachial muscle response to cognitive load in a dual-task scenario.

Authors:  Elke Leyman; Gary Mirka; David Kaber; Carolyn Sommerich
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Perceived muscular tension, job strain, physical exposure, and associations with neck pain among VDU users; a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  J Wahlström; M Hagberg; A Toomingas; E Wigaeus Tornqvist
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.