AIMS: To determine whether perceived muscular tension, job strain, or physical exposure are associated with increased risk of developing neck pain among VDU users. METHODS: A baseline questionnaire was answered by 1283 respondents, of whom 671 were free from neck pain at baseline. Perceived muscular tension, job strain, and physical exposure were assessed at baseline. Information about newly developed neck pain was collected in 10 follow up questionnaires and the case definition was the first report of such pain in any of the follow up questionnaires. Median follow up time was 10.9 months. RESULTS: Both men and women who perceived muscular tension at least a few times per week, compared to those who had not perceived muscular tension the preceding month, had an incidence rate ratio (IRR) of 1.9 (95% CI 1.25 to 2.93) for developing neck pain, when stratifying for sex. High perceived muscular tension was associated with an increased risk (IRR 1.6, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.91), even when controlling for job strain, physical exposure, and age in the model stratified by sex. CONCLUSIONS: Perceived muscular tension was associated with an increased risk of developing neck pain among VDU users. The combination of high job strain and high perceived muscular tension was associated with higher risk of developing neck pain than the combination of high physical exposure and high perceived muscular tension. There was an indication of an excess risk due to interaction between high physical exposure and high job strain.
AIMS: To determine whether perceived muscular tension, job strain, or physical exposure are associated with increased risk of developing neck pain among VDU users. METHODS: A baseline questionnaire was answered by 1283 respondents, of whom 671 were free from neck pain at baseline. Perceived muscular tension, job strain, and physical exposure were assessed at baseline. Information about newly developed neck pain was collected in 10 follow up questionnaires and the case definition was the first report of such pain in any of the follow up questionnaires. Median follow up time was 10.9 months. RESULTS: Both men and women who perceived muscular tension at least a few times per week, compared to those who had not perceived muscular tension the preceding month, had an incidence rate ratio (IRR) of 1.9 (95% CI 1.25 to 2.93) for developing neck pain, when stratifying for sex. High perceived muscular tension was associated with an increased risk (IRR 1.6, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.91), even when controlling for job strain, physical exposure, and age in the model stratified by sex. CONCLUSIONS: Perceived muscular tension was associated with an increased risk of developing neck pain among VDU users. The combination of high job strain and high perceived muscular tension was associated with higher risk of developing neck pain than the combination of high physical exposure and high perceived muscular tension. There was an indication of an excess risk due to interaction between high physical exposure and high job strain.
Authors: K Fredriksson; L Alfredsson; C B Thorbjörnsson; L Punnett; A Toomingas; M Torgén; A Kilbom Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2000-11 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: E W Tornqvist; A Kilbom ; E Vingård; L Alfredsson; M Hagberg; T Theorell; M Waldenström; C Wiktorin; C Hogstedt Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Fredric Gerr; Michele Marcus; Cindy Ensor; David Kleinbaum; Susan Cohen; Alicia Edwards; Eileen Gentry; Daniel J Ortiz; Carolyn Monteilh Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: G A Ariëns; P M Bongers; M Douwes; M C Miedema; W E Hoogendoorn; G van der Wal; L M Bouter; W van Mechelen Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: T J Armstrong; P Buckle; L J Fine; M Hagberg; B Jonsson; A Kilbom; I A Kuorinka; B A Silverstein; G Sjogaard; E R Viikari-Juntura Journal: Scand J Work Environ Health Date: 1993-04 Impact factor: 5.024
Authors: Wilhelmus Johannes Andreas Grooten; Marie Mulder; Malin Josephson; Lars Alfredsson; Christina Wiktorin Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2007-08-25 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Jonas Winkel Holm; Jan Hartvigsen; Svend Lings; Kirsten Ohm Kyvik Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2012-03-18 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Jens Wahlström; Lage Burström; Mats Hagberg; Ronnie Lundström; Tohr Nilsson Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2007-10-09 Impact factor: 3.015