Literature DB >> 15204291

Cervicobrachial muscle response to cognitive load in a dual-task scenario.

Elke Leyman1, Gary Mirka, David Kaber, Carolyn Sommerich.   

Abstract

People working in an office environment often have to deal with significant cognitive workload due to the coordination of multiple, simultaneous tasks. The objective of this research was to examine the impact of cognitive load in office-type tasks on physical-stress response, using a dual-task paradigm involving a primary cognitive task and secondary typing task. The central hypothesis of this research was that altering the demands of the cognitive task would lead to a difference in physical stress-level and performance. Cognitive load was manipulated by presenting participants with three different types of cognitive tasks described in taxonomy, including skill-, rule-, and knowledge-based tasks. Dependent variables examined in the study included: (1) electromyographic activity of the upper trapezius (pars descendens) and cervical erector spinae muscles, (2) performance in a secondary typing task, and (3) subjective measures of stress and cognitive workload. The results of this study revealed that the primary task causing the highest level of perceived workload also produced 61% higher muscle activity in the right trapezius, and 6 and 11% higher activity in the left and right cervical erector spinae, respectively, in comparison to muscle activity associated with the cognitive task causing the lowest perceived workload. With respect to performance, a 23% decrease was observed in typing productivity when the rule-based task was completed simultaneously vs. typing in the absence of any additional cognitive task (the baseline condition). This information may be used to better organize work activities in office environments to increase performance and reduce stress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15204291     DOI: 10.1080/00140130310001629766

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  7 in total

1.  Effects of concurrent physical and cognitive demands on muscle activity and heart rate variability in a repetitive upper-extremity precision task.

Authors:  Divya Srinivasan; Svend Erik Mathiassen; David M Hallman; Afshin Samani; Pascal Madeleine; Eugene Lyskov
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Effects of physical and mental task demands on cervical and upper limb muscle activity and physiological responses during computer tasks and recovery periods.

Authors:  Yuling Wang; Grace P Y Szeto; Chetwyn C H Chan
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Experimental manipulation of psychosocial exposure and questionnaire sensitivity in a simulated manufacturing setting.

Authors:  Laura H Ikuma; Kari Babski-Reeves; Maury A Nussbaum
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 3.015

4.  Can cognitive activities during breaks in repetitive manual work accelerate recovery from fatigue? A controlled experiment.

Authors:  Svend Erik Mathiassen; David M Hallman; Eugene Lyskov; Staffan Hygge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Estimating Cognitive Workload in an Interactive Virtual Reality Environment Using EEG.

Authors:  Christoph Tremmel; Christian Herff; Tetsuya Sato; Krzysztof Rechowicz; Yusuke Yamani; Dean J Krusienski
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 6.  The effects of workplace stressors on muscle activity in the neck-shoulder and forearm muscles during computer work: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  B H W Eijckelhof; M A Huysmans; J L Bruno Garza; B M Blatter; J H van Dieën; J T Dennerlein; A J van der Beek
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Overloaded and at Work: Investigating the Effect of Cognitive Workload on Assembly Task Performance.

Authors:  Francesco N Biondi; Angela Cacanindin; Caitlyn Douglas; Joel Cort
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 2.888

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.