Literature DB >> 18929668

Investigating the neural correlates of continuous speech computation with frequency-tagged neuroelectric responses.

Marco Buiatti1, Marcela Peña, Ghislaine Dehaene-Lambertz.   

Abstract

In order to learn an oral language, humans have to discover words from a continuous signal. Streams of artificial monotonous speech can be readily segmented based on the statistical analysis of the syllables' distribution. This parsing is considerably improved when acoustic cues, such as subliminal pauses, are added suggesting that a different mechanism is involved. Here we used a frequency-tagging approach to explore the neural mechanisms underlying word learning while listening to continuous speech. High-density EEG was recorded in adults listening to a concatenation of either random syllables or tri-syllabic artificial words, with or without subliminal pauses added every three syllables. Peaks in the EEG power spectrum at the frequencies of one and three syllables occurrence were used to tag the perception of a monosyllabic or tri-syllabic structure, respectively. Word streams elicited the suppression of a one-syllable frequency peak, steadily present during random streams, suggesting that syllables are no more perceived as isolated segments but bounded to adjacent syllables. Crucially, three-syllable frequency peaks were only observed during word streams with pauses, and were positively correlated to the explicit recall of the detected words. This result shows that pauses facilitate a fast, explicit and successful extraction of words from continuous speech, and that the frequency-tagging approach is a powerful tool to track brain responses to different hierarchical units of the speech structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18929668     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  31 in total

1.  Cortical encoding of acoustic and linguistic rhythms in spoken narratives.

Authors:  Cheng Luo; Nai Ding
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  Cortical tracking of constituent structure in language acquisition.

Authors:  Heidi Getz; Nai Ding; Elissa L Newport; David Poeppel
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2018-09-05

3.  Syllables in Sync Form a Link: Neural Phase-locking Reflects Word Knowledge during Language Learning.

Authors:  Laura Batterink
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  High-frequency neural activity predicts word parsing in ambiguous speech streams.

Authors:  Anne Kösem; Anahita Basirat; Leila Azizi; Virginie van Wassenhove
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Statistical learning of speech regularities can occur outside the focus of attention.

Authors:  Laura J Batterink; Ken A Paller
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 4.027

6.  EEG time-warping to study non-strictly-periodic EEG signals related to the production of rhythmic movements.

Authors:  B Chemin; G Huang; D Mulders; A Mouraux
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 2.390

7.  Online neural monitoring of statistical learning.

Authors:  Laura J Batterink; Ken A Paller
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 4.027

8.  Rule-based and Word-level Statistics-based Processing of Language: Insights from Neuroscience.

Authors:  Nai Ding; Lucia Melloni; Xing Tian; David Poeppel
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 2.331

9.  Effects of sutures and fontanels on MEG and EEG source analysis in a realistic infant head model.

Authors:  Seok Lew; Danielle D Sliva; Myong-sun Choe; P Ellen Grant; Yoshio Okada; Carsten H Wolters; Matti S Hämäläinen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-03-24       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Uncertainty in visual and auditory series is coded by modality-general and modality-specific neural systems.

Authors:  Samuel Nastase; Vittorio Iacovella; Uri Hasson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.