Literature DB >> 18928669

Prostate cancer chemoprevention: update of the prostate cancer prevention trial findings and implications for clinical practice.

Jamey A Sarvis1, Ian M Thompson.   

Abstract

This article updates the findings of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT) based on recent publications and reviews of the PCPT. New evidence shows that finasteride reduces the overall risk of prostate cancer by 30% and reduces the risk of clinically significant prostate cancer, including high-grade tumors. For tumors with Gleason scores of < or = 6, men in the finasteride arm had a relative risk reduction (RRR) of 34% (RR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.55-0.80; P < or = 0.0001); tumors with Gleason scores of > or = 7 had an RRR of 27% (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.56-0.96; P = 0.02). The effect of finasteride on sexual function appears to be minimal as men on finasteride had an average 3.21 point increase on the 100 point Sexual Activity Scale compared with men on placebo. With an excellent safety profile and minimal side effects, men aged 55 years or older should be informed of the opportunity to reduce their risk of prostate cancer with finasteride.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18928669     DOI: 10.1007/s11912-008-0080-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep        ISSN: 1523-3790            Impact factor:   5.075


  14 in total

1.  Assessing prostate cancer risk: results from the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial.

Authors:  Ian M Thompson; Donna Pauler Ankerst; Chen Chi; Phyllis J Goodman; Catherine M Tangen; M Scott Lucia; Ziding Feng; Howard L Parnes; Charles A Coltman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  The prostate cancer prevention trial: design, biases and interpretation of study results.

Authors:  Phyllis J Goodman; Ian M Thompson; Catherine M Tangen; John J Crowley; Leslie G Ford; Charles A Coltman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Effect of finasteride on the sensitivity of PSA for detecting prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ian M Thompson; Chen Chi; Donna Pauler Ankerst; Phyllis J Goodman; Catherine M Tangen; Scott M Lippman; M Scott Lucia; Howard L Parnes; Charles A Coltman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-08-16       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 4.  Implications of the prostate cancer prevention trial: a decision analysis model of survival outcomes.

Authors:  Yair Lotan; Jeffrey A Cadeddu; J Jack Lee; Claus G Roehrborn; Scott M Lippman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-03-20       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  SELECT: the next prostate cancer prevention trial. Selenum and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial.

Authors:  E A Klein; I M Thompson; S M Lippman; P J Goodman; D Albanes; P R Taylor; C Coltman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Finasteride improves the sensitivity of digital rectal examination for prostate cancer detection.

Authors:  Ian M Thompson; Catherine M Tangen; Phyllis J Goodman; M Scott Lucia; Howard L Parnes; Scott M Lippman; Charles A Coltman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Pathologic and clinical findings to predict tumor extent of nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostate cancer.

Authors:  J I Epstein; P C Walsh; M Carmichael; C B Brendler
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-02-02       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Chemoprevention of prostate cancer in men at high risk: rationale and design of the reduction by dutasteride of prostate cancer events (REDUCE) trial.

Authors:  Gerald Andriole; David Bostwick; Otis Brawley; Leonard Gomella; Michael Marberger; Donald Tindall; Sharon Breed; Matt Somerville; Roger Rittmaster
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Pathologic characteristics of cancers detected in The Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial: implications for prostate cancer detection and chemoprevention.

Authors:  M Scott Lucia; Amy K Darke; Phyllis J Goodman; Francisco G La Rosa; Howard L Parnes; Leslie G Ford; Charles A Coltman; Ian M Thompson
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2008-05-18

10.  Finasteride does not increase the risk of high-grade prostate cancer: a bias-adjusted modeling approach.

Authors:  Mary W Redman; Catherine M Tangen; Phyllis J Goodman; M Scott Lucia; Charles A Coltman; Ian M Thompson
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2008-05-18
View more
  6 in total

1.  [Prevention of uro-oncological diseases].

Authors:  B J Schmitz-Dräger; G Lümmen; E Bismarck; C Fischer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Tissue slice grafts: an in vivo model of human prostate androgen signaling.

Authors:  Hongjuan Zhao; Rosalie Nolley; Zuxiong Chen; Donna M Peehl
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 3.  [Primary prevention of urologic tumors: prostate cancer].

Authors:  B J Schmitz-Dräger; G Lümmen; E Bismarck; C Fischer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Atmospheric pressure photoionization tandem mass spectrometry of androgens in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Fred Bjørn Lih; Mark A Titus; James L Mohler; Kenneth B Tomer
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  Chemopreventive effect of PSP through targeting of prostate cancer stem cell-like population.

Authors:  Sze-Ue Luk; Terence Kin-Wah Lee; Ji Liu; Davy Tak-Wing Lee; Yung-Tuen Chiu; Stephanie Ma; Irene Oi-Lin Ng; Yong-Chuan Wong; Franky Leung Chan; Ming-Tat Ling
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  2-methoxyestradiol Prevents LNCaP Tumor Development in Nude Mice: Potential Role of G2/M Regulatory Proteins.

Authors:  Cara Horny; Muralimanoharan Sri Balasubashini; Krishna Komanduri; Manonmani Ganapathy; I-Tien Yeh; Rita Ghosh; Addanki P Kumar
Journal:  J Cell Death       Date:  2009-06-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.