Literature DB >> 18927057

The effect of subadditive pretraining on blocking: limits on generalization.

Daniel S Wheeler1, Tom Beckers, Ralph R Miller.   

Abstract

Recent evidence indicates that prior learning about a set of cues may determine how new cues are processed. If subjects are taught that two reliable predictors of an outcome do not summate when the cues are presented together (i.e., subadditive pretraining), the subjects will tend to show a less profound blocking effect when trained with different cues. Three experiments investigated the conditions necessary for subadditive pretraining to generalize to new cues. Experiment 1 demonstrated that subadditive pretraining is less effective in reducing blocking when it is experienced in a context other than that in which the blocking training is experienced. In Experiment 2, the effectiveness of subadditive pretraining waned with time. Experiment 3 showed that subadditive pretraining is more effective when the temporal characteristics of pretraining cues are similar to those of the cues used in blocking training. These results provide information concerning the conditions under which learning will generalize from one set of cues to another.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18927057      PMCID: PMC2660671          DOI: 10.3758/LB.36.4.341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  19 in total

Review 1.  Forgetting of stimulus attributes: methodological implications for assessing associative phenomena.

Authors:  D C Riccio; J Ackil; A Burch-Vernon
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 2.  Stimulus coding in human associative learning: flexible representations of parts and wholes.

Authors:  Klaus G Melchers; David R Shanks; Harald Lachnit
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2007-10-13       Impact factor: 1.777

3.  Reasoning rats: forward blocking in Pavlovian animal conditioning is sensitive to constraints of causal inference.

Authors:  Tom Beckers; Ralph R Miller; Jan De Houwer; Kouji Urushihara
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2006-02

4.  Context-specific conditioning in the conditioned-emotional-response procedure.

Authors:  G Hall; R C Honey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1990-07

5.  Blocking in human electrodermal conditioning.

Authors:  J Hinchy; P F Lovibond; K M Ter-Horst
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  1995-02

Review 6.  Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning.

Authors:  M E Bouton
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Similarity and discrimination: a selective review and a connectionist model.

Authors:  J M Pearce
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Memory retrieval deficits based upon altered contextual cues: a paradox.

Authors:  D C Riccio; R Richardson; D L Ebner
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  The experimental task influences cue competition in human causal learning.

Authors:  Klaus G Melchers; Metin Ungör; Harald Lachnit
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2005-10

10.  Outcome and cue properties modulate blocking.

Authors:  Jan De Houwer; Tom Beckers; Steven Glautier
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2002-07
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  On the generality and limits of abstraction in rats and humans.

Authors:  Gonzalo P Urcelay; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.084

2.  Failures to replicate blocking are surprising and informative-Reply to Soto (2018).

Authors:  Elisa Maes; Angelos-Miltiadis Krypotos; Yannick Boddez; Joaquín Matías Alfei Palloni; Rudi D'Hooge; Jan De Houwer; Tom Beckers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2018-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.