Literature DB >> 18927037

Cue usage in memory for location when orientation is fixed.

Sylvia Fitting1, Douglas H Wedell, Gary L Allen.   

Abstract

In previous research, it was demonstrated that including one or three cues surrounding a circular field had no effect on spatial memory for dot locations when the field's orientation was fixed, but that there were very large effects when orientation varied across trials (Fitting, Wedell, & Allen, 2007). In four new experiments, we explored the use of external cues in the fixed orientation environment, using 0, 4, 8, or 24 cues and manipulating task difficulty. In Experiments 1-3, the angular bias data supported the use of four quadrant-based prototypes regardless of cue condition, but there were clear cue effects on radial prototype locations. Increasing the number of cues enhanced accuracy of spatial memory for targets closer to cues. In Experiment 4, we severely challenged memory by using multiple targets and a filled delay before estimation. Doing so demonstrated an effect of cues on the categorical structuring of memory. Collectively, findings indicate that when orientation is fixed, cues bolster fine-grain memory, but that they only alter the default categorical scheme when memory demands are high.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18927037     DOI: 10.3758/MC.36.6.1196

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  19 in total

1.  Intrinsic frames of reference in spatial memory.

Authors:  Weimin Mou; Timothy P McNamara
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  The time course of spatial memory distortions.

Authors:  Steffen Werner; Jörn Diedrichsen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-07

3.  Toward a formal theory of flexible spatial behavior: geometric category biases generalize across pointing and verbal response types.

Authors:  John P Spencer; Vanessa R Simmering; Anne R Schutte
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Shape effects on memory for location.

Authors:  Douglas H Wedell; Sylvia Fitting; Gary L Allen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-08

5.  Categories and particulars: prototype effects in estimating spatial location.

Authors:  J Huttenlocher; L V Hedges; S Duncan
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Bias in spatial location due to categorization: comment on Tversky and Schiano.

Authors:  P H Engebretson; J Huttenlocher
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1996-03

7.  Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science.

Authors:  R N Shepard
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-09-11       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge.

Authors:  R D Easton; M J Sholl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Delay-induced bias in children's memory for location.

Authors:  Alycia M Hund; Jodie M Plumert
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2002 May-Jun

10.  Short-term memory effects on the representation of two-dimensional space in the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  Hugo Merchant; Antonio F Fortes; Apostolos P Georgopoulos
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2003-12-11       Impact factor: 3.084

View more
  3 in total

1.  From maps to navigation: the role of cues in finding locations in a virtual environment.

Authors:  Adam T Hutcheson; Douglas H Wedell
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-08

2.  Moderating the route angularity effect in a virtual environment: support for a dual memory representation.

Authors:  Adam T Hutcheson; Douglas H Wedell
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-06

Review 3.  Sex differences in the weighting of metric and categorical information in spatial location memory.

Authors:  Mark P Holden; Sarah J Duff-Canning; Elizabeth Hampson
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-01-17
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.