OBJECTIVE: To describe the impact of co-morbidities, visual acuity, diabetic retinopathy (DR) grade, and macular edema (ME) on the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) among patients with diabetic retinopathy. METHODS: Analysis of data of 207 patients with diabetic retinopathy from Germany in 2003. HRQOL assessment was done using the generic (SF-12) questionnaire. It was hypothesized that exogenous variables (co-morbidities, visual acuity impairment, DR, and ME) would have an impact on HRQOL. Using a structural equation modelling procedure, the effects of exogenous variables on endogenous variables physical component summaries (PSC) and mental component summaries (MCS) reflecting HRQOL were tested. RESULTS: The number of co-morbidities had a negative effect on visual acuity (b = -0.26, standardized) and a similar negative effect on PCS (b = -0.27). DR grade had a negative effect on visual acuity (b = -0.19) and a positive effect on the variable ME (b = 0.44). ME displayed a negative effect on visual acuity (b = -0.58) and also on MCS (b = -0.29). Visual acuity had a positive effect (b = 0.48) on PCS. CONCLUSIONS: Presence of DR and ME, visual acuity impairment and patient co-morbidities lead to significant impairment of both the physical and mental components of HRQOL.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the impact of co-morbidities, visual acuity, diabetic retinopathy (DR) grade, and macular edema (ME) on the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) among patients with diabetic retinopathy. METHODS: Analysis of data of 207 patients with diabetic retinopathy from Germany in 2003. HRQOL assessment was done using the generic (SF-12) questionnaire. It was hypothesized that exogenous variables (co-morbidities, visual acuity impairment, DR, and ME) would have an impact on HRQOL. Using a structural equation modelling procedure, the effects of exogenous variables on endogenous variables physical component summaries (PSC) and mental component summaries (MCS) reflecting HRQOL were tested. RESULTS: The number of co-morbidities had a negative effect on visual acuity (b = -0.26, standardized) and a similar negative effect on PCS (b = -0.27). DR grade had a negative effect on visual acuity (b = -0.19) and a positive effect on the variable ME (b = 0.44). ME displayed a negative effect on visual acuity (b = -0.58) and also on MCS (b = -0.29). Visual acuity had a positive effect (b = 0.48) on PCS. CONCLUSIONS: Presence of DR and ME, visual acuity impairment and patient co-morbidities lead to significant impairment of both the physical and mental components of HRQOL.
Authors: Søren T Knudsen; Toke Bek; Per L Poulsen; Marianne N Hove; Michael Rehling; Carl E Mogensen Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: C P Wilkinson; Frederick L Ferris; Ronald E Klein; Paul P Lee; Carl David Agardh; Matthew Davis; Diana Dills; Anselm Kampik; R Pararajasegaram; Juan T Verdaguer Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Mark Unruh; Guofen Yan; Milena Radeva; Ron D Hays; Robert Benz; Nicolaos V Athienites; John Kusek; Andrew S Levey; Klemens B Meyer Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Ecosse L Lamoureux; Manjula Marella; Benjamin Chang; Mohamed Dirani; Au Eong Kah-Guan; Audrey Chia; Terry L Young; Tien Y Wong; Seang Mei Saw Journal: Optom Vis Sci Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 1.973
Authors: Krystal Khoo; Ryan E K Man; Gwyn Rees; Preeti Gupta; Ecosse L Lamoureux; Eva K Fenwick Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2019-03-16 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Alan M Jacobson; Barbara H Braffett; Patricia A Cleary; Rose A Gubitosi-Klug; Mary E Larkin Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2013-07-08 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Nuria Alcubierre; Esther Rubinat; Alicia Traveset; Montserrat Martinez-Alonso; Marta Hernandez; Carmen Jurjo; Didac Mauricio Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2014-08-20 Impact factor: 3.186