Literature DB >> 12874468

Bias in assessment of health-related quality of life in a hemodialysis population: a comparison of self-administered and interviewer-administered surveys in the HEMO study.

Mark Unruh1, Guofen Yan, Milena Radeva, Ron D Hays, Robert Benz, Nicolaos V Athienites, John Kusek, Andrew S Levey, Klemens B Meyer.   

Abstract

ABSTRACT. Examined is the relationship of patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQOL) to the mode of survey administration in the Hemodialysis Study. In addition to self-administered surveys to assess HRQOL, interviewer-administered surveys were made available to include patients with poor vision, decreased manual dexterity, or strong preference. For examining the predictors of participation by self-administration of the survey, multiple logistic regression was performed. For examining the relationship of HRQOL results to mode of survey administration, adjusted differences between the self-administered and interviewer-administered groups were obtained from multiple linear regression models accounting for sociodemographic and case-mix factors. A total of 978 of the first 1000 subjects in the Hemodialysis Study completed the survey by interview (n = 427) or by self-administration (n = 551). The interviewer-administered group was older, was more likely black, had longer duration of ESRD, had a higher prevalence of diabetes, and had more severe comorbidity (all P < 0.01). After adjustment for these differences, patients in the interviewer-administered group had higher scores on scales that measured Role-Physical, Role-Emotional, and Effects of Kidney Disease (all P < 0.001). Dialysis studies that restrict HRQOL measurement to patients who are able to complete surveys without assistance will not accurately represent the health of the overall hemodialysis population. Clinical studies and clinical practices using HRQOL as an outcome should include interviewer administration or risk a selection bias against subjects with older age, minority status, and higher level of comorbidity. Future investigation should include research of survey modalities with a low response burden such as telephone interview, computer-assisted interview, and proxy administration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12874468     DOI: 10.1097/01.asn.0000076076.88336.b1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1046-6673            Impact factor:   10.121


  14 in total

1.  Predictors of health utility among 60-day survivors of acute kidney injury in the Veterans Affairs/National Institutes of Health Acute Renal Failure Trial Network Study.

Authors:  Kirsten L Johansen; Mark W Smith; Mark L Unruh; Andrew M Siroka; Theresa Z O'Connor; Paul M Palevsky
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Design and rationale of health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes assessment in the Frequent Hemodialysis Network trials.

Authors:  Manisha Jhamb; Manjula K Tamura; Jennifer Gassman; Amit X Garg; Robert M Lindsay; Rita S Suri; George Ting; Fredric O Finkelstein; Scott Beach; Paul L Kimmel; Mark Unruh
Journal:  Blood Purif       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 2.614

3.  Effects of six versus three times per week hemodialysis on physical performance, health, and functioning: Frequent Hemodialysis Network (FHN) randomized trials.

Authors:  Yoshio N Hall; Brett Larive; Patricia Painter; George A Kaysen; Robert M Lindsay; Allen R Nissenson; Mark L Unruh; Michael V Rocco; Glenn M Chertow
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  Comparison of symptom management strategies for pain, erectile dysfunction, and depression in patients receiving chronic hemodialysis: a cluster randomized effectiveness trial.

Authors:  Steven D Weisbord; Maria K Mor; Jamie A Green; Mary Ann Sevick; Anne Marie Shields; Xinhua Zhao; Bruce L Rollman; Paul M Palevsky; Robert M Arnold; Michael J Fine
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 5.  Health related quality of life in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh; Mark Unruh
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Implications of new geriatric diabetes care guidelines for the assessment of quality of care in older patients.

Authors:  Elbert S Huang; Greg A Sachs; Marshall H Chin
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Rationale and design of A Trial of Sertraline vs. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for End-stage Renal Disease Patients with Depression (ASCEND).

Authors:  S Susan Hedayati; Divya M Daniel; Scott Cohen; Bryan Comstock; Daniel Cukor; Yaminette Diaz-Linhart; Laura M Dember; Amelia Dubovsky; Tom Greene; Nancy Grote; Patrick Heagerty; Wayne Katon; Paul L Kimmel; Nancy Kutner; Lori Linke; Davin Quinn; Tessa Rue; Madhukar H Trivedi; Mark Unruh; Steven Weisbord; Bessie A Young; Rajnish Mehrotra
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 2.226

8.  One-Year Linear Trajectories of Symptoms, Physical Functioning, Cognitive Functioning, Emotional Well-being, and Spiritual Well-being Among Patients Receiving Dialysis.

Authors:  Mi-Kyung Song; Sudeshna Paul; Sandra E Ward; Constance A Gilet; Gerald A Hladik
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 8.860

9.  Diabetic retinopathy and health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Eldad Davidov; Lusine Breitscheidel; Johannes Clouth; Marion Reips; Michael Happich
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Validation of diabetes health-related quality-of-life instruments using cognitive interviewing with older African Americans.

Authors:  Gayenell S Magwood; Carolyn Jenkins; Jane Zapka
Journal:  J Nurs Meas       Date:  2009
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.