Literature DB >> 18922668

Peritonectomy with high voltage electrocautery generates higher levels of ultrafine smoke particles.

S N Andréasson1, H Anundi, B Sahlberg, C-G Ericsson, R Wålinder, G Enlund, L Påhlman, H Mahteme.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To adequately perform peritonectomy, the use of an electrocautery device at a high voltage is recommended. The aim of this study was to analyse the amount of airborne and ultrafine particles (UFP) generated during peritonectomy and to compare this with standard colon and rectal cancer surgery (CRC).
METHOD: UFP was measured approximately 2-3 cm from the breathing area of the surgeon (personal sampling) and 3 m from where the electrocautery smoke was generated (stationary sampling) from 14 consecutive peritonectomy procedures and 11 standard CRC resections. The sampling was by P-Trak UFP counter that has the capacity to detect particle size ranging from 0.02 to 1 microm.
RESULTS: The cumulative level of UFP of personal sampling in the peritonectomy group was higher (9.3 x 10(6) particle/ml/h (pt/ml/h)) than in the control group (4.8 x 10(5) pt/ml/h). A higher cumulative level of UFP in stationary sampling was observed in the PC group (2.6 x 10(6) pt/ml/h) than in the control group (3.9 x 10(4)pt/ml/h).
CONCLUSION: Peritonectomy procedure with high voltage electrocautery generates elevated levels of UFP than standard CRC surgery does. The level of UFP produced by a peritonectomy is comparable to cigarette smoking. More efficient smoke evacuator systems are needed in order to reduce the levels of UFP generated during electrocautery surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18922668     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2008.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  10 in total

Review 1.  Is surgical smoke harmful to theater staff? a systematic review.

Authors:  Nicholas Mowbray; James Ansell; Neil Warren; Pete Wall; Jared Torkington
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Surgical smoke control with local exhaust ventilation: Experimental study.

Authors:  Taekhee Lee; Jhy-Charm Soo; Ryan F LeBouf; Dru Burns; Diane Schwegler-Berry; Michael Kashon; Jay Bowers; Martin Harper
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  Surgical Team Exposure to Cautery Smoke and Its Mitigation during Tonsillectomy.

Authors:  Daniel C O'Brien; Eun Gyung Lee; Jhy-Charm Soo; Sherri Friend; Sarah Callaham; Michele M Carr
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 4.  Surgical smoke and the anesthesia provider.

Authors:  Barry N Swerdlow
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 5.  Preoperative Preparation and Patient Selection for Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC.

Authors:  Rangole Ashvin; Jain Nikhilesh
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-02-27

6.  Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in electrocautery smoke during peritonectomy procedures.

Authors:  Sara Näslund Andréasson; Haile Mahteme; Bo Sahlberg; Helena Anundi
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2012-05-22

7.  Performance of Facepiece Respirators and Surgical Masks Against Surgical Smoke: Simulated Workplace Protection Factor Study.

Authors:  Shuang Gao; Richard H Koehler; Michael Yermakov; Sergey A Grinshpun
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2016-02-28

8.  Comparison of Surgical Smoke Generated During Electrosurgery with Aerosolized Particulates from Ultrasonic and High-Speed Cutting.

Authors:  Vincent J Casey; Cian Martin; Peter Curtin; Kevin Buckley; Laoise M McNamara
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 3.934

9.  Surgical Smoke-Hazard Perceptions and Protective Measures in German Operating Rooms.

Authors:  Martina Michaelis; Felix Martin Hofmann; Albert Nienhaus; Udo Eickmann
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Attitude, preventive practice and perceived barriers among perioperative and anesthesia nurses toward surgical smoke hazards during the COVID-19 outbreak.

Authors:  Mojgan Lotfi; Zahra Sheikhalipour; Vahid Zamanzadeh; Ahmadmirza Aghazadeh; Hassan Khordeforoush; Parvin Rahmani; Omid Zadi Akhuleh
Journal:  Perioper Care Oper Room Manag       Date:  2021-12-15
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.