Literature DB >> 1891821

Optokinetic torsion: dynamics and relation to circularvection.

B S Cheung1, I P Howard.   

Abstract

Continuous records of optokinetic torsion to sinusoidal inputs were obtained using the electromagnetic scleral search-coil technique. We measured the gain and phase lag of optokinetic torsion in response to a spherical visual display rotating steadily at various angular velocities and sinusoidally at frequencies from 0.2 to 2.0 Hz and at amplitudes from 10 to 80 deg. Gain (peak slow-phase eye velocity over stimulus angular velocity) of up to 0.12 were obtained with stimulus frequencies of 0.2 Hz and declined to an average value of about 0.02 at a frequency of 2.0 Hz. Phase lag was virtually zero at a frequency of 0.2 Hz and increased to over 80 deg at 2.0 Hz. The records from the sinusoidal stimuli show very few quick phases. With increasing stimulus amplitudes, the amplitude of the response increased but its gain declined. We found no evidence of torsional after-nystagmus nor any relation between the torsional response and reports of vection or sensation of body tilt induced by the rotating display. Torsional optokinetic nystagmus is most suited to compensate for low-amplitude, low-frequency stimulus rotation and normally supplements torsion induced by head tilt.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1891821     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(91)90054-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  15 in total

1.  Premotor neurons encode torsional eye velocity during smooth-pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  Dora E Angelaki; J David Dickman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Gait deviations induced by visual stimulation in roll.

Authors:  Erich Schneider; Klaus Jahn; Marianne Dieterich; Thomas Brandt; Michael Strupp
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Dependence of the roll angular vestibuloocular reflex (aVOR) on gravity.

Authors:  Sergei B Yakushin; Yongqing Xiang; Bernard Cohen; Theodore Raphan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Gravity dependence of the effect of optokinetic stimulation on the subjective visual vertical.

Authors:  Bryan K Ward; Christopher J Bockisch; Nicoletta Caramia; Giovanni Bertolini; Alexander Andrea Tarnutzer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Cycloversion and cyclovergence: the effects of the area and position of the visual display.

Authors:  I P Howard; L Sun; X Shen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The effects of background visual roll stimulation on postural and manual control and self-motion perception.

Authors:  F H Previc; R V Kenyon; E R Boer; B H Johnson
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-07

7.  Cyclovergence: a comparison of objective and psychophysical measurements.

Authors:  I P Howard; M Ohmi; L Sun
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The initial torsional Ocular Following Response (tOFR) in humans: a response to the total motion energy in the stimulus?

Authors:  B M Sheliga; E J Fitzgibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  The effects of head and trunk position on torsional vestibular and optokinetic eye movements in humans.

Authors:  M J Morrow; J A Sharpe
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Torsional optokinetic nystagmus: normal response characteristics.

Authors:  S J Farooq; F A Proudlock; I Gottlob
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.638

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.