Literature DB >> 7813687

Cycloversion and cyclovergence: the effects of the area and position of the visual display.

I P Howard1, L Sun, X Shen.   

Abstract

Rotation of a display in the frontal plane evokes a conjugate nystagmic rotation of the eyes (cycloversion) about the visual axes, with slow phases in the direction of stimulus motion--a response known as torsional optokinetic nystagmus (TOKN). Antiphase rotation of large dichoptic displays evokes a disconjugate rotation of the eyes about the visual axes, a response known as cyclovergence. Using the scleral-coil technique for monitoring eye movements we recorded TOKN evoked by black-and-white sectored displays rotating about the visual axis at an angular velocity of 30 degrees/s. The display was confined to central areas with diameters ranging from 5 degrees to full field or with the central 5 degrees to 75 degrees occluded. A 5 degrees central display evoked TOKN with 40% of the gain for the full-field display and gain increased as a function of the size of the display. The gain of TOKN decreased with increasing size of a central occluder. These characteristics of TOKN are similar to those of horizontal OKN. Cyclovergence was virtually absent with a 5 degrees display but was immune to occlusion of the central 40 degrees. Cyclovergence therefore differs from cycloversion in showing no preference for centrally placed stimuli. These effects are free from the influence of stationary edges, since these were concentric with the stimulus motion. The effects are also free from the influence of voluntary pursuit, since humans do not normally have voluntary control over torsional eye movements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7813687     DOI: 10.1007/bf02738410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  18 in total

1.  Optically induced eye torsion. I. Fusion cyclovergence.

Authors:  R A Crone; Y Everhard-Hard
Journal:  Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1975-07-04

2.  Visual cancellation of the torsional vestibulo-ocular reflex in humans.

Authors:  R J Leigh; E F Maas; G E Grossman; D A Robinson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Human gaze stability in the horizontal, vertical and torsional direction during voluntary head movements, evaluated with a three-dimensional scleral induction coil technique.

Authors:  L Ferman; H Collewijn; T C Jansen; A V Van den Berg
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Inter-saccadic interval analysis of optokinetic nystagmus.

Authors:  M Cheng; J S Outerbridge
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Eye torsion in response to a tilted visual stimulus.

Authors:  D R Goodenough; E Sigman; P K Oltman; J Rosso; H Mertz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Cyclovergence: a comparison of objective and psychophysical measurements.

Authors:  I P Howard; M Ohmi; L Sun
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The effect of stimulus size on human cyclofusional response.

Authors:  A E Kertesz; M J Sullivan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Control of human optokinetic nystagmus by the central and peripheral retina: effects of partial visual field masking, scotopic vision and central retinal scotomata.

Authors:  G C Van Die; H Collewijn
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1986-09-24       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Human ocular counterroll: assessment of static and dynamic properties from electromagnetic scleral coil recordings.

Authors:  H Collewijn; J Van der Steen; L Ferman; T C Jansen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Human cyclovergence as a function of stimulus frequency and amplitude.

Authors:  I P Howard; J E Zacher
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  5 in total

1.  Responses of macaque V1 neurons to binocular orientation differences.

Authors:  H Bridge; B G Cumming
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The stimulus integration area for horizontal vergence.

Authors:  Robert S Allison; Ian P Howard; Xueping Fang
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-02-18       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Torsional eye movements during psychophysical testing with rotating patterns.

Authors:  M R Ibbotson; N S C Price; V E Das; M A Hietanen; M J Mustari
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-11-16       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The initial torsional Ocular Following Response (tOFR) in humans: a response to the total motion energy in the stimulus?

Authors:  B M Sheliga; E J Fitzgibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Torsional optokinetic nystagmus: normal response characteristics.

Authors:  S J Farooq; F A Proudlock; I Gottlob
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.638

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.