Literature DB >> 8405246

The effects of head and trunk position on torsional vestibular and optokinetic eye movements in humans.

M J Morrow1, J A Sharpe.   

Abstract

We measured torsional vestibular and optokinetic eye movements in human subjects with the head and trunk erect, with the head supine and the trunk erect, and with the head and trunk supine, in order to quantify the effects of otolithic and proprioceptive modulation. During active head movements, the torsional vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) had significantly higher gain with the head upright than with the head supine, indicating that dynamic otolithic inputs can supplement the semicircular canal-ocular reflex. During passive earth-vertical axis rotation, torsional VOR gain was similar with the head and trunk supine and with the head supine and the trunk erect. This finding implies that static proprioceptive information from the neck and trunk has little effect upon the torsional VOR. VOR gain with the head supine was not increased by active, self-generated head movement compared with passive, whole body rotation, indicating that the torsional VOR is not augmented by dynamic proprioceptive inputs or by an efference copy of a command for head movement. Viewing earth-fixed surroundings enhanced the torsional VOR, while fixating a chair-fixed target suppressed the VOR, especially at low frequencies. Torsional optokinetic nystagmus (OKN) evoked by a full-field stimulus had a mean slow-phase gain of 0.22 for 10 degrees/s drum rotation, but gain fell to 0.06 for 80 degrees/s stimuli. Despite this fall in gain, mean OKN slow-phase velocities increased with drum speed, reaching maxima of 2.5 degrees/s-8.0 degrees/s in our subjects. Optokinetic after nystagmus (OKAN) was typically absent.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8405246     DOI: 10.1007/bf00229663

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  25 in total

1.  Eye movements during motion after-effect.

Authors:  S H Seidman; R J Leigh; C W Thomas
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  The torsional vestibuloocular reflex can be canceled but not enhanced by visual stimuli.

Authors:  S H Seidman; R J Leigh
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1992-05-22       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Influence of gravity on cat vertical vestibulo-ocular reflex.

Authors:  D L Tomko; C Wall; F R Robinson; J P Staab
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Visual cancellation of the torsional vestibulo-ocular reflex in humans.

Authors:  R J Leigh; E F Maas; G E Grossman; D A Robinson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Human gaze stability in the horizontal, vertical and torsional direction during voluntary head movements, evaluated with a three-dimensional scleral induction coil technique.

Authors:  L Ferman; H Collewijn; T C Jansen; A V Van den Berg
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Organizational principles of velocity storage in three dimensions. The effect of gravity on cross-coupling of optokinetic after-nystagmus.

Authors:  T Raphan; B Cohen
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  Training of voluntary torsion.

Authors:  R Balliet; K Nakayama
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Human ocular counterroll: assessment of static and dynamic properties from electromagnetic scleral coil recordings.

Authors:  H Collewijn; J Van der Steen; L Ferman; T C Jansen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Physiology of peripheral neurons innervating otolith organs of the squirrel monkey. III. Response dynamics.

Authors:  C Fernández; J M Goldberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Ocular counter-rolling during active head tilting in humans.

Authors:  T Viéville; D Masse
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1987 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.494

View more
  10 in total

1.  Premotor neurons encode torsional eye velocity during smooth-pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  Dora E Angelaki; J David Dickman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Effects of earth-fixed vs head-fixed targets on static ocular counterroll.

Authors:  Manokaraananthan Chandrakumar; Zahra Hirji; Herbert C Goltz; Giuseppe Mirabella; Alan W Blakeman; Linda Colpa; Agnes M F Wong
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-04

3.  Static ocular counterroll: video-based analysis after minimizing the false-torsion factors.

Authors:  Ichiro Hamasaki; Satoshi Hasebe; Hiroshi Ohtsuki
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  Visual spatial clues enhance ocular torsion response during visual tilt.

Authors:  Tony Pansell; Ulrika Sverkersten; Jan Ygge
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Effects of age, viewing distance and target complexity on static ocular counterroll.

Authors:  Herbert C Goltz; Giuseppe Mirabella; Joanne C Y Leung; Alan W Blakeman; Linda Colpa; Khaled Abuhaleeqa; Agnes M F Wong
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-05-03       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  The initial vestibulo-ocular reflex and its visual enhancement and cancellation in humans.

Authors:  J L Johnston; J A Sharpe
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The initial torsional Ocular Following Response (tOFR) in humans: a response to the total motion energy in the stimulus?

Authors:  B M Sheliga; E J Fitzgibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Torsional optokinetic nystagmus: normal response characteristics.

Authors:  S J Farooq; F A Proudlock; I Gottlob
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Vertical, horizontal, and torsional eye movement responses to head roll in the squirrel monkey.

Authors:  S H Seidman; L Telford; G D Paige
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Effect of small head tilt on ocular fundus image: Consideration of proper head positioning for ocular fundus scanning.

Authors:  Shin Hae Park; Nam Yeo Kang; Jihyun Kim; Jiwon Baek; Seung Woo Hong
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.889

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.