Literature DB >> 1886676

Lumbar disc surgery: results of the Prospective Lumbar Discectomy Study of the Joint Section on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons and the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.

J N Abramovitz1, S R Neff.   

Abstract

The Prospective Lumbar Discectomy Study enrolled 740 patients in a multiphysician, multicenter, consecutive patient protocol to evaluate the indications and efficacy of lumbar discectomy. Five hundred and thirteen patients could be evaluated at 3 months after surgery. Stepwise logistic regression showed that the factors of fraction of pain referred to the back, work-related injury, absence of back pain on straight leg-raise examination, correspondence of leg pain to typical radicular patterns, leg pain on straight leg-raise examination, and reflex asymmetry were independently predictive of good outcome from surgery. Univariate analysis of the case with different numbers of predictive factors present showed that use of the operating microscope, sensory deficit, central disc bulge, and free disc fragment were correlated with outcome only in subgroups. An analysis of unsatisfactory outcomes showed two patterns: one of failure as a result of mechanical back pain and one of failure as a result of radiculopathy. Factors predictive of outcome did not influence the type of failure. In a stepwise logistic regression analysis, facetectomy and preoperative sensory deficit were associated with increased likelihood of mechanical back pain failure, while preoperative motor deficit was associated with an increased likelihood of radicular failure. The results support several intuitively derived and commonly believed principles of lumbar disc surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1886676

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  17 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of bio-psychosocial risk factors for an unfavourable outcome after lumbar disc surgery.

Authors:  Jasper J den Boer; Rob A B Oostendorp; Tjemme Beems; Marten Munneke; Margreet Oerlemans; Andrea W M Evers
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-05-25       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  MRI after successful lumbar discectomy.

Authors:  J W Van Goethem; E Van de Kelft; I G Biltjes; B A van Hasselt; L van den Hauwe; P M Parizel; A M De Schepper
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Does the choice of outcome scale influence prognostic factors for lumbar disc surgery? A prospective, consecutive study of 121 patients.

Authors:  C Woertgen; M Holzschuh; R D Rothoerl; A Brawanski
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Predictors of clinical outcome following lumbar disc surgery: the value of historical, physical examination, and muscle function variables.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Hebert; Julie M Fritz; Shane L Koppenhaver; Anne Thackeray; Per Kjaer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Comparison of postural control in unilateral stance between healthy controls and lumbar discectomy patients with and without pain.

Authors:  Katie Bouche; Veerle Stevens; Dirk Cambier; Jacques Caemaert; Lieven Danneels
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-08-18       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Who should have surgery for an intervertebral disc herniation? Comparative effectiveness evidence from the spine patient outcomes research trial.

Authors:  Adam Pearson; Jon Lurie; Tor Tosteson; Wenyan Zhao; William Abdu; Sohail Mirza; James Weinstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Who should have surgery for spinal stenosis? Treatment effect predictors in SPORT.

Authors:  Adam Pearson; Jon Lurie; Tor Tosteson; Wenyan Zhao; William Abdu; James N Weinstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  SPORT lumbar intervertebral disk herniation and back pain: does treatment, location, or morphology matter?

Authors:  Adam M Pearson; Emily A Blood; John W Frymoyer; Harry Herkowitz; William A Abdu; Randy Woodward; Michael Longley; Sanford E Emery; Jon D Lurie; Tor D Tosteson; James N Weinstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  The risk of "getting worse" after lumbar microdiscectomy.

Authors:  Tore K Solberg; Oystein P Nygaard; Kristin Sjaavik; Dag Hofoss; Tor Ingebrigtsen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-05-06       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  The Potential of N-Rich Plasma-Polymerized Ethylene (PPE:N) Films for Regulating the Phenotype of the Nucleus Pulposus.

Authors:  Fackson Mwale; Alain Petit; Hong Tian Wang; Laura M Epure; Pierre-Luc Girard-Lauriault; Jean A Ouellet; Michael R Wertheimer; John Antoniou
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2008-10-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.