INTRODUCTION: Intra-abdominal adhesions are a significant source of postoperative morbidity. Bioresorbable barriers composed of hyaluronic acid and carboxymethylcellulose (HA/CMC) reduce adhesion formation by physically separating injured or healing peritoneal surfaces. To assess whether the efficacy of a physical barrier can extend beyond the site of application, we evaluated the effectiveness of an HA/CMC barrier in preventing adhesions distal to the site of placement. METHODS: Adhesions were induced in rats by creating peritoneal ischemic buttons on either side of a midline incision. An HA/CMC barrier (Seprafilm Genzyme) was intraoperatively placed either under the midline incision, unilaterally over half the ischemic buttons, or bilaterally over all ischemic buttons. Control buttons received no HA/CMC. On day 7 adhesions were scored. In similar experiments, peritoneal fluid was collected at 24 h to assess the effects of HA/CMC on tissue plasminogen activator activity. RESULTS: Placement of HA/CMC under the midline incision did not reduce adhesion formation to distal ischemic buttons (72 +/- 7%) compared to controls (80 +/- 8%). Unilateral placement of HA/CMC significantly (p < 0.05) reduced adhesion formation to those ischemic buttons over which the barrier was applied (35 +/- 7%) compared to both contralateral (83 +/- 9%) and control (80 +/- 8%) ischemic buttons. The bilateral application of HA/CMC also significantly (p < 0.05) reduced adhesion formation to all ischemic buttons compared to controls (22 +/- 7% vs. 66 +/- 7%, respectively). HA/CMC did not affect peritoneal tPA activity. CONCLUSIONS: Effective adhesion reduction by the physical barrier HA/CMC appears to be limited to the site of application in this rat model. Despite the presence of a bioresorbable membrane at predicted sites of adhesion formation in the peritoneal cavity, adhesions readily form to distal unprotected sites.
INTRODUCTION: Intra-abdominal adhesions are a significant source of postoperative morbidity. Bioresorbable barriers composed of hyaluronic acid and carboxymethylcellulose (HA/CMC) reduce adhesion formation by physically separating injured or healing peritoneal surfaces. To assess whether the efficacy of a physical barrier can extend beyond the site of application, we evaluated the effectiveness of an HA/CMC barrier in preventing adhesions distal to the site of placement. METHODS: Adhesions were induced in rats by creating peritoneal ischemic buttons on either side of a midline incision. An HA/CMC barrier (Seprafilm Genzyme) was intraoperatively placed either under the midline incision, unilaterally over half the ischemic buttons, or bilaterally over all ischemic buttons. Control buttons received no HA/CMC. On day 7 adhesions were scored. In similar experiments, peritoneal fluid was collected at 24 h to assess the effects of HA/CMC on tissue plasminogen activator activity. RESULTS: Placement of HA/CMC under the midline incision did not reduce adhesion formation to distal ischemic buttons (72 +/- 7%) compared to controls (80 +/- 8%). Unilateral placement of HA/CMC significantly (p < 0.05) reduced adhesion formation to those ischemic buttons over which the barrier was applied (35 +/- 7%) compared to both contralateral (83 +/- 9%) and control (80 +/- 8%) ischemic buttons. The bilateral application of HA/CMC also significantly (p < 0.05) reduced adhesion formation to all ischemic buttons compared to controls (22 +/- 7% vs. 66 +/- 7%, respectively). HA/CMC did not affect peritoneal tPA activity. CONCLUSIONS: Effective adhesion reduction by the physical barrier HA/CMC appears to be limited to the site of application in this rat model. Despite the presence of a bioresorbable membrane at predicted sites of adhesion formation in the peritoneal cavity, adhesions readily form to distal unprotected sites.
Authors: M C Parker; M S Wilson; H van Goor; B J Moran; J Jeekel; J-J Duron; D Menzies; S D Wexner; H Ellis Journal: Colorectal Dis Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 3.788
Authors: Stanley J Heydrick; Karen L Reed; Philip A Cohen; Cary B Aarons; Adam C Gower; James M Becker; Arthur F Stucchi Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2007-09-10 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Christoph Brochhausen; Volker H Schmitt; Constanze N E Planck; Taufiek K Rajab; David Hollemann; Christine Tapprich; Bernhard Krämer; Christian Wallwiener; Helmut Hierlemann; Rolf Zehbe; Heinrich Planck; C James Kirkpatrick Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Holly K Sheldon; Melanie L Gainsbury; Michael R Cassidy; Daniel I Chu; Arthur F Stucchi; James M Becker Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2011-10-08 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Michael R Cassidy; Alan C Sherburne; Holly K Sheldon; Melanie L Gainsbury; Stanley Heydrick; Arthur F Stucchi Journal: Surgery Date: 2013-11-14 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Bernhard W Renz; Kurt Leitner; Erich Odermatt; Daniel L Worthley; Martin K Angele; Karl-Walter Jauch; Reinhold A Lang Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2014-03-04 Impact factor: 3.445