BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To our knowledge, there has been no study that compares the radiation dose delivered to the eye lens by 16- and 64-section multidetector CT (MDCT) for standard clinical neuroimaging protocols. Our aim was to assess radiation-dose differences between 16- and 64-section MDCT from the same manufacturer, by using near-identical neuroimaging protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three cadaveric heads were scanned on 16- and 64-section MDCT by using standard neuroimaging CT protocols. Eye lens dose was measured by using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD), and each scanning was repeated to reduce random error. The dose-length product, volume CT dose index (CTDI(vol)), and TLD readings for each imaging protocol were averaged and compared between scanners and protocols, by using the paired Student t test. Statistical significance was defined at P < .05. RESULTS: The radiation dose delivered and eye lens doses were lower by 28.1%-45.7% (P < .000) on the 64-section MDCT for near-identical imaging protocols. On the 16-section MDCT, lens dose reduction was greatest (81.1%) on a tilted axial mode, compared with a nontilted helical mode for CT brain scans. Among the protocols studied, CT of the temporal bone delivered the greatest radiation dose to the eye lens. CONCLUSIONS: Eye lens radiation doses delivered by the 64-section MDCT are significantly lower, partly due to improvements in automatic tube current modulation technology. However, where applicable, protection of the eyes from the radiation beam by either repositioning the head or tilting the gantry remains the best way to reduce eye lens dose.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To our knowledge, there has been no study that compares the radiation dose delivered to the eye lens by 16- and 64-section multidetector CT (MDCT) for standard clinical neuroimaging protocols. Our aim was to assess radiation-dose differences between 16- and 64-section MDCT from the same manufacturer, by using near-identical neuroimaging protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three cadaveric heads were scanned on 16- and 64-section MDCT by using standard neuroimaging CT protocols. Eye lens dose was measured by using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD), and each scanning was repeated to reduce random error. The dose-length product, volume CT dose index (CTDI(vol)), and TLD readings for each imaging protocol were averaged and compared between scanners and protocols, by using the paired Student t test. Statistical significance was defined at P < .05. RESULTS: The radiation dose delivered and eye lens doses were lower by 28.1%-45.7% (P < .000) on the 64-section MDCT for near-identical imaging protocols. On the 16-section MDCT, lens dose reduction was greatest (81.1%) on a tilted axial mode, compared with a nontilted helical mode for CT brain scans. Among the protocols studied, CT of the temporal bone delivered the greatest radiation dose to the eye lens. CONCLUSIONS: Eye lens radiation doses delivered by the 64-section MDCT are significantly lower, partly due to improvements in automatic tube current modulation technology. However, where applicable, protection of the eyes from the radiation beam by either repositioning the head or tilting the gantry remains the best way to reduce eye lens dose.
Authors: Mathias Meyer; Holger Haubenreisser; Rainer Raupach; Bernhard Schmidt; Florian Lietzmann; Christianne Leidecker; Thomas Allmendinger; Thomas Flohr; Lothar R Schad; Stefan O Schoenberg; Thomas Henzler Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-09-08 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Ki Mun Kang; Hoon Sik Choi; Bae Kwon Jeong; Jin Ho Song; In-Bong Ha; Yun Hee Lee; Chul Hang Kim; Hojin Jeong Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2017-05-07