Literature DB >> 24742638

Differences between the fourth and fifth Korotkoff phases among children and adolescents.

David S Freedman1, Jennifer L Foltz2, Gerald S Berenson3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The relative importance of the fourth (K4) and fifth (K5) Korotkoff phases as the indicator of diastolic blood pressure (DBP) levels among children remains uncertain.
METHODS: In a sample of 11,525 youth aged 5-17, we examined interexaminer differences in these 2 phases and the relation of theses 2 phases to adult blood pressure levels and hypertension. The longitudinal analyses were conducted among 2,156 children who were re-examined after age 25 years.
RESULTS: Mean (±SD) levels of DBP were 62 (±9) mm Hg (K4) and 49 (±13) mm Hg (K5). K4 showed less interobserver variability than did K5, and 7% of the children had at least 1 (of 6) K5 value of 0mm Hg. Longitudinal analyses indicated that K4 was more strongly associated with adult blood pressure levels and hypertension. In correlational analyses of subjects who were not using antihypertensive medications in adulthood (n = 1,848), K4 was more strongly associated with the adult DBP level than was K5 (r = 0.22 vs. 0.17; P < 0.01). Analyses of adult hypertension (based on high blood pressure levels or use of antihypertensive medications) indicated that the screening performance of childhood levels of K4 was similar to that of systolic blood pressure and was higher than that of K5, with areas under the receiver operator characteristic curves of 0.63 (systolic blood pressure), 0.63 (K4), and 0.57 (K5).
CONCLUSIONS: As compared with K5 levels among children, K4 shows less interobserver variability and is more strongly associated with adult hypertension. © Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of American Journal of Hypertension Ltd 2014. This work is written by (a) US Government employees(s) and is in the public domain in the US.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Korotkoff phases; blood pressure; children; diastolic blood pressure; hypertension; longitudinal; systolic blood pressure.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24742638      PMCID: PMC4288115          DOI: 10.1093/ajh/hpu064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hypertens        ISSN: 0895-7061            Impact factor:   2.689


  34 in total

1.  Cuff bladder size in a blood pressure survey of children.

Authors:  A W Voors
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  INDEX OF INDIRECT ESTIMATION OF DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE. MUFFLING VERSUS COMPLETE CESSATION OF VASCULAR SOUNDS.

Authors:  A J MOSS; F H ADAMS
Journal:  Am J Dis Child       Date:  1963-10

3.  Pulse sounds and measurement of diastolic blood pressure in children.

Authors:  M Uhari; M Nuutinen; J Turtinen; T Pokka
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-07-20       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Blood pressure measurement.

Authors:  S Londe
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Diastolic fourth and fifth phase blood pressure in 10-15-year-old children. The Children and Adolescent Blood Pressure Program.

Authors:  A R Sinaiko; O Gomez-Marin; R J Prineas
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Update on the 1987 Task Force Report on High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents: a working group report from the National High Blood Pressure Education Program. National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on Hypertension Control in Children and Adolescents.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Criteria for diastolic pressure: revolution, counterrevolution, and now a compromise.

Authors:  A J Moss
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Report of the Second Task Force on Blood Pressure Control in Children--1987. Task Force on Blood Pressure Control in Children. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Korotkoff sounds in neonates, infants, and toddlers.

Authors:  Kenneth R Knecht; John D Seller; Bruce S Alpert
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2009-02-28       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Longitudinal prediction of adult blood pressure from juvenile blood pressure levels.

Authors:  M J Nelson; D R Ragland; S L Syme
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1992-09-15       Impact factor: 4.897

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Pulsatile and Steady-State Pressure Trends in Children: Is the Future Now?: Comment on the Paper by Zachariah and Kovacikova [Pulse 2014;2:57-62].

Authors:  Michael F O'Rourke
Journal:  Pulse (Basel)       Date:  2015-02-03

2.  Utility of Different Blood Pressure Measurement Components in Childhood to Predict Adult Carotid Intima-Media Thickness.

Authors:  Juha Koskinen; Markus Juonala; Terence Dwyer; Alison Venn; Janina Petkeviciene; Indrė Čeponienė; Lydia Bazzano; Wei Chen; Matthew A Sabin; Trudy L Burns; Jorma S A Viikari; Jessica G Woo; Elaine M Urbina; Ronald Prineas; Nina Hutri-Kähönen; Alan Sinaiko; David R Jacobs; Julia Steinberger; Stephen Daniels; Olli Raitakari; Costan G Magnussen
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 10.190

3.  Can Pediatric Hypertension Criteria Be Simplified? A Prediction Analysis of Subclinical Cardiovascular Outcomes From the Bogalusa Heart Study.

Authors:  Bo Xi; Tao Zhang; Shengxu Li; Emily Harville; Lydia Bazzano; Jiang He; Wei Chen
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 10.190

4.  Assessment of diastolic blood pressure with the auscultatory method in children and adolescents under exercise conditions.

Authors:  Jonathan P Glenning; Kevin Lam; Melanie M Clarke; Hannah Bourne; Joseph J Smolich; Michael M H Cheung; Jonathan P Mynard
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 3.872

5.  Smartphone addiction may be associated with adolescent hypertension: a cross-sectional study among junior school students in China.

Authors:  Yunfei Zou; Ning Xia; Yunqing Zou; Zhen Chen; Yufeng Wen
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 2.125

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.