Literature DB >> 18849636

Values for macular perimetry using the MP-1 microperimeter in normal subjects.

Vinay A Shah1, K V Chalam.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To establish values for the fixation pattern and macular sensitivity to light in healthy subjects using the MP-1 microperimeter (Nideck Technologies, Vigonza, Italy).
METHOD: A prospective study of 37 healthy subjects (age: 19-71 years), approved by the institutional review board. Full-threshold microperimetry of the central 12 degrees of the retina (the macula) was performed prospectively, utilizing 16 points with the MP-1. The fixation stability was simultaneously recorded during microperimetry testing. The relationship between the fixation pattern and light sensitivity with age was calculated using linear regression analysis.
RESULTS: Microperimetry was performed on 66 eyes. Total mean sensitivity was 18.33 dB (range: 13.0-19 dB). Mean macular sensitivities at 2 degrees , 4 degrees and 6 degrees as measured by the MP-1 were 18.4+/-2.0, 18.2+/-2.3 and 18.2+/-2.1 dB, respectively. The linear regression analysis revealed a 0.019240, 0.0248 and 0.0285 dB per year age-related decline in mean macular sensitivity at 2 degrees, 4 degrees and 6 degrees from the center of the macula, respectively. The total mean fixation stability values within 2 degrees and 4 degrees were 86 and 96%, respectively. The linear regression analysis also revealed a 0.344% and 0.122% per year decline in age-related fixation stability within 2 degrees and 4 degrees , respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the median retinal sensitivity or fixation stability values for sex or race in the study.
CONCLUSIONS: The MP-1 may be a reliable tool to measure macular sensitivity. Among normal healthy subjects, there was a linear decline in light sensitivity with increasing age. Copyright 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18849636     DOI: 10.1159/000162111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Res        ISSN: 0030-3747            Impact factor:   2.892


  11 in total

1.  Changes in retinal sensitivity in geographic atrophy progression as measured by microperimetry.

Authors:  Annal D Meleth; Pradeep Mettu; Elvira Agrón; Emily Y Chew; Srinivas R Sadda; Frederick L Ferris; Wai T Wong
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Fundus-controlled two-color dark adaptometry with the Microperimeter MP1.

Authors:  Wadim Bowl; Knut Stieger; Birgit Lorenz
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Macular retinal sensitivity using MP-1 in healthy Malaysian subjects of different ages.

Authors:  Siti Aishah Ismail; Haliza Abdul Mutalib; Nor Fariza Ngah
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2015-05-27

4.  Structural and functional correlation in sickle cell retinopathy using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and scanning laser ophthalmoscope microperimetry.

Authors:  Clement C Chow; Mohamed A Genead; Anastasios Anastasakis; Felix Y Chau; Gerald A Fishman; Jennifer I Lim
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-07-02       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Retinal sensitivity assessed by microperimetry and corresponding retinal structure and thickness in resolved central serous chorioretinopathy.

Authors:  H W Chung; C M Yun; J T Kim; S-W Kim; J Oh; K Huh
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Clinical value, normative retinal sensitivity values, and intrasession repeatability using a combined spectral domain optical coherence tomography/scanning laser ophthalmoscope microperimeter.

Authors:  A Anastasakis; J J McAnany; G A Fishman; W H Seiple
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Comparing the Nidek MP-1 and Humphrey field analyzer in normal subjects.

Authors:  Jennifer H Acton; Nicholas S Bartlett; Vivienne C Greenstein
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Variability in monocular and binocular fixation during standard automated perimetry.

Authors:  Kazunori Hirasawa; Kaoru Kobayashi; Asuka Shibamoto; Houmi Tobari; Yuki Fukuda; Nobuyuki Shoji
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Retinal Differential Light Sensitivity Variation Across the Macula in Healthy Subjects: Importance of Cone Separation and Loci Eccentricity.

Authors:  Danuta M Sampson; Danial Roshandel; Avenell L Chew; Yufei Wang; Paul G Stevenson; Matthew N Cooper; Elaine Ong; Lawrence Wong; Jonathan La; David Alonso-Caneiro; Enid Chelva; Jane C Khan; David D Sampson; Fred K Chen
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 3.283

10.  Retinal sensitivity in healthy Indians using microperimeter.

Authors:  Laxmi Gella; Muneeswar Gupta Nittala; Rajiv Raman
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.848

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.