Literature DB >> 18849333

Subject-specific profiles of QT/RR hysteresis.

Marek Malik1, Katerina Hnatkova, Tomas Novotny, Georg Schmidt.   

Abstract

The time lag of the QT interval adaptation to heart rate changes (QT/RR hysteresis) was studied in 40 healthy subjects (18 females; mean age, 30.4+/-8.1 yr) with 3 separate daytime (>13 h) 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECG) in each subject. In each recording, 330 individual 10-s ECG segments were measured, including 100 segments preceded by 2 min of heart rate varying greater than +/-2 beats/min. Other segments were preceded by a stable heart rate. In segments preceded by variable rate, QT/RR hysteresis was characterized by lambda parameters of the exponential decay models. The intrasubject SDs of lambda values were compared with the intersubject SD of the individual means. The lambda values were also correlated to individually optimized parameters of heart rate correction. Intrasubject SDs of lambda were substantially smaller than the population SD of individual means (0.390+/-0.197 vs. 0.711, P<0.0001). The lambda values were unrelated to the QT/RR correction parameters. When compared with the corrected QT (QTc) for averaged RR intervals in 10-s ECGs and with the averaged RR intervals in 2-min history, QTc for QT/RR hysteresis led to a substantially smaller SD of QTc values (11.4+/-2.00, 6.33+/-1.31, and 4.66+/-0.85 ms, respectively, P<0.0001). Thus the speed with which the QT interval adapts to heart rate changes is highly individual with intrasubject stability and intersubject variability. QT/RR hysteresis is independent of the static QT/RR relationship and should be considered as a separate physiological process. The combination of individual heart rate correction with individual hysteresis correction of the QT interval is likely to lead to substantial improvements of cardiac repolarization studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18849333     DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00625.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6135            Impact factor:   4.733


  38 in total

1.  QT-RR hysteresis is caused by differential autonomic states during exercise and recovery.

Authors:  Daniel J Pelchovitz; Jason Ng; Alexandru B Chicos; Daniel W Bergner; Jeffrey J Goldberger
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 4.733

2.  Effects of head-up tilt-table test on the QT interval.

Authors:  Michael Findler; Amir Birger; Shmuel Diamant; Sami Viskin
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  QT/RR Coupling and Gender Differences.

Authors:  Josef Halámek; Pavel Jurák; Jolana Lipoldová; Pavel Leinveber
Journal:  Comput Cardiol (2010)       Date:  2010

Review 4.  Clinical applications of QT/RR hysteresis assessment: A systematic review.

Authors:  Hugo Gravel; Vincent Jacquemet; Nagib Dahdah; Daniel Curnier
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 1.468

5.  Drug-induced changes in the T-wave morphology.

Authors:  Marek Malik
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 6.  Update on the evaluation of a new drug for effects on cardiac repolarization in humans: issues in early drug development.

Authors:  Vaibhav Salvi; Dilip R Karnad; Gopi Krishna Panicker; Snehal Kothari
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 7.  Assessing QT interval prolongation and its associated risks with antipsychotics.

Authors:  Jimmi Nielsen; Claus Graff; Jørgen K Kanters; Egon Toft; David Taylor; Jonathan M Meyer
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 5.749

8.  A novel method for patient-specific QTc--modeling QT-RR hysteresis.

Authors:  David M Hadley; Victor F Froelicher; Paul J Wang
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.468

9.  Comparison of Digital 12-Lead ECG and Digital 12-Lead Holter ECG Recordings in Healthy Male Subjects: Results from a Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Duolao Wang; Ameet Bakhai; Radivoj Arezina; Jörg Täubel
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 10.  Categorization and theoretical comparison of quantitative methods for assessing QT/RR hysteresis.

Authors:  Hugo Gravel; Daniel Curnier; Nagib Dahdah; Vincent Jacquemet
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 1.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.