Literature DB >> 21251128

A novel method for patient-specific QTc--modeling QT-RR hysteresis.

David M Hadley1, Victor F Froelicher, Paul J Wang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiac repolarization adaptation to cycle length change is patient dependent and results in complex QT-RR hysteresis. We hypothesize that accurate patient-specific QT-RR curves and rate corrected QT values (QTc) can be derived through patient-specific modeling of hysteresis. METHOD AND
RESULTS: Model development was supported by QT-RR observations from 1959 treadmill tests, allowing extensive exploration of the influences of autonomic function on QT adaptation to rate changes. The methodology quantifies and then removes patient-specific repolarization adaptation rates. The estimated average 95% QT confidence limit was approximately 1 msec for the studied population. The model was validated by comparing QT-RR curves derived from a submaximal exercise protocol with rapid exercise and recovery phases, characterized by high hysteresis, with QT-RR values derived from an incremental stepped protocol that held heart rate constant for 5 minutes at each stage of exercise and recovery.
CONCLUSIONS: The underlying physiologic changes affecting QT dynamics during the transitions from rest to exercise to recovery are quite complex. Nevertheless, a simple patient-specific model, comprising only three parameters and based solely on the preceding history of RR intervals and trend, is sufficient to accurately model QT hysteresis over an entire exercise test for a diverse population. A brief recording of a resting ECG, combined with a short period of submaximal exercise and recovery, provides sufficient information to derive an accurate patient-specific QT-RR curve, eliminating QTc bias inherent in population-based correction formulas. ©2011, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21251128      PMCID: PMC6932088          DOI: 10.1111/j.1542-474X.2010.00401.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol        ISSN: 1082-720X            Impact factor:   1.468


  17 in total

1.  Comparison of formulae for heart rate correction of QT interval in exercise ECGs from healthy children.

Authors:  A Benatar; T Decraene
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  How to correct the QT interval for the effects of heart rate in clinical studies.

Authors:  Patrick Davey
Journal:  J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.950

3.  Estimation of the QT/RR hysteresis lag.

Authors:  Esther Pueyo; Peter Smetana; Pablo Laguna; Marek Malik
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.438

4.  Subject-specific profiles of QT/RR hysteresis.

Authors:  Marek Malik; Katerina Hnatkova; Tomas Novotny; Georg Schmidt
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 4.733

5.  Relation between QT and RR intervals is highly individual among healthy subjects: implications for heart rate correction of the QT interval.

Authors:  M Malik; P Färbom; V Batchvarov; K Hnatkova; A J Camm
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 6.  Rate-corrected QT interval: techniques and limitations.

Authors:  C Funck-Brentano; P Jaillon
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1993-08-26       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Relation between QT intervals and heart rates from 40 to 120 beats/min in rest electrocardiograms of men and a simple method to adjust QT interval values.

Authors:  J Karjalainen; M Viitasalo; M Mänttäri; V Manninen
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Individual QT-R-R relationship: average stability over time does not rule out an individual residual variability: implication for the assessment of drug effect on the QT interval.

Authors:  Fabrice Extramiana; Pierre Maison-Blanche; Fabio Badilini; Philippe Beaufils; Antoine Leenhardt
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.468

9.  An improved method for adjusting the QT interval for heart rate (the Framingham Heart Study)

Authors:  A Sagie; M G Larson; R J Goldberg; J R Bengtson; D Levy
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1992-09-15       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Characterization of the non-linear rate-dependency of QT interval in humans.

Authors:  G Malfatto; M Facchini; A Zaza
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.214

View more
  4 in total

1.  Use of continuous ECG for improvements in assessing the standing response as a positive control for QT prolongation.

Authors:  Anthony A Fossa; Meijian Zhou; Nuala Brennan; Patrick Round; John Ford
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 2.  Categorization and theoretical comparison of quantitative methods for assessing QT/RR hysteresis.

Authors:  Hugo Gravel; Daniel Curnier; Nagib Dahdah; Vincent Jacquemet
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  Universal Correction for QT/RR Hysteresis.

Authors:  Marek Malik; Lars Johannesen; Katerina Hnatkova; Norman Stockbridge
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  Value of the New Spline QTc Formula in Adjusting for Pacing-Induced Changes in Heart Rate.

Authors:  Hirmand Nouraei; Matthew Bennett; Simon Rabkin
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 1.866

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.