Literature DB >> 22542617

QT-RR hysteresis is caused by differential autonomic states during exercise and recovery.

Daniel J Pelchovitz1, Jason Ng, Alexandru B Chicos, Daniel W Bergner, Jeffrey J Goldberger.   

Abstract

QT-RR hysteresis is characterized by longer QT intervals at a given RR interval while heart rates are increasing during exercise and shorter QT intervals at the same RR interval while heart rates are decreasing during recovery. It has been attributed to a lagging QT response to different directional changes in RR interval during exercise and recovery. Twenty control subjects (8 males, age 51 ± 6 yr), 16 subjects with type 2 diabetes (12 males, age 56 ± 8 yr), 71 subjects with coronary artery disease (CAD) and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (≥50%) (51 males, age 59 ± 12 yr), and 17 CAD subjects with depressed LVEF (<50%) (13 males, age 57 ± 10 yr) underwent two 16-min exercise tests followed by recovery. In session 2, parasympathetic blockade with atropine (0.04 mg/kg) was achieved at end exercise. QT-RR hysteresis was quantified as: 1) the area bounded by the QT-RR relationships for exercise and recovery in the range of the minimum RR interval at peak exercise to the minimum RR interval + 100 ms and 2) the difference in QT interval duration between exercise and recovery at the minimum RR interval achieved during peak exercise plus 50 ms (ΔQT). The effect of parasympathetic blockade was assessed by substituting the QT-RR relationship after parasympathetic blockade. QT-RR hysteresis was positive in all groups at baseline and reversed by parasympathetic blockade (P < 0.01). We conclude that QT-RR hysteresis is not caused by different directional changes in RR interval during exercise and recovery. Instead, it is predominantly mediated by differential autonomic nervous system effects as the heart rate increases during exercise vs. as it decreases during recovery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22542617      PMCID: PMC3378268          DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00041.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6135            Impact factor:   4.733


  45 in total

1.  The impact of QT lag compensation on dynamic assessment of ventricular repolarization: reproducibility and the impact of lead selection.

Authors:  C C Lang; A D Flapan; J M Neilson
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.976

2.  Parasympathetic effects on cardiac electrophysiology during exercise and recovery.

Authors:  Prince J Kannankeril; Jeffrey J Goldberger
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.733

3.  Changes in QT interval with exercise in elite male rowers and controls.

Authors:  Kim Rajappan; Clare O'Connell; Desmond J Sheridan
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.164

4.  Control of heart rate by the autonomic nervous system. Studies in man on the interrelation between baroreceptor mechanisms and exercise.

Authors:  B F Robinson; S E Epstein; G D Beiser; E Braunwald
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1966-08       Impact factor: 17.367

5.  Effect of combined sympathetic and parasympathetic blockade on heart rate and cardiac function in man.

Authors:  A D Jose
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1966-09       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Sex differences in QTc interval and QT dispersion: dynamics during exercise and recovery in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Vijay S Chauhan; Andrew D Krahn; Bruce D Walker; George J Klein; Allan C Skanes; Raymond Yee
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.749

7.  Beta blockers normalize QT hysteresis in long QT syndrome.

Authors:  Andrew D Krahn; Raymond Yee; Vijay Chauhan; Allan C Skanes; Jian Wang; Robert A Hegele; George J Klein
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.749

8.  Association of fasting plasma glucose with heart rate recovery in healthy adults: a population-based study.

Authors:  Claudia Panzer; Michael S Lauer; Andreas Brieke; Eugene Blackstone; Byron Hoogwerf
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 9.461

9.  Abnormal heart rate recovery immediately after treadmill testing: correlation with clinical, exercise testing, and myocardial perfusion parameters.

Authors:  Panagiotis Georgoulias; Alexandros Orfanakis; Nikolaos Demakopoulos; Petros Xaplanteris; Georgios Mortzos; Panos Vardas; Nikolaos Karkavitsas
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Influence of autonomic nervous system dysfunction on the development of type 2 diabetes: the CARDIA study.

Authors:  Mercedes R Carnethon; David R Jacobs; Stephen Sidney; Kiang Liu
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  7 in total

1.  Cardiac electrical conduction, autonomic activity and biomarker release during recovery from prolonged strenuous exercise in trained male cyclists.

Authors:  Glenn M Stewart; Justin J Kavanagh; Gus Koerbin; Michael J Simmonds; Surendran Sabapathy
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  Clinical applications of QT/RR hysteresis assessment: A systematic review.

Authors:  Hugo Gravel; Vincent Jacquemet; Nagib Dahdah; Daniel Curnier
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 3.  Categorization and theoretical comparison of quantitative methods for assessing QT/RR hysteresis.

Authors:  Hugo Gravel; Daniel Curnier; Nagib Dahdah; Vincent Jacquemet
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 1.468

4.  Heart-rate-corrected QT interval evolution in premature infants during the first week of life.

Authors:  Timothy J B Ulrich; Marc A Ellsworth; William A Carey; Adeel S Zubair; Brianna C MacQueen; Christopher E Colby; Michael J Ackerman
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 1.655

5.  The high frequency relationship: implications for torsadogenic hERG blockers.

Authors:  P Champeroux; J Y Le Guennec; S Jude; C Laigot; A Maurin; M L Sola; J S L Fowler; S Richard; J Thireau
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 8.739

6.  Sex and Rate Change Differences in QT/RR Hysteresis in Healthy Subjects.

Authors:  Irena Andršová; Katerina Hnatkova; Martina Šišáková; Ondřej Toman; Peter Smetana; Katharina M Huster; Petra Barthel; Tomáš Novotný; Georg Schmidt; Marek Malik
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Exercise based assessment of cardiac autonomic function in type 1 versus type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Goldberger; Daniel J Pelchovitz; Jason Ng; Haris Subacius; Alexandru B Chicos; Smriti Banthia; Mark Molitch; Ronald B Goldberg
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 2.737

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.