Literature DB >> 32522683

Reliability and responsiveness of virtual portion size creation tasks: Influences of context, foods, and a bariatric surgical procedure.

Jeon D Hamm1, Jany Dotel2, Shoran Tamura3, Ari Shechter4, Musya Herzog5, Jeffrey M Brunstrom6, Jeanine Albu2, F Xavier Pi-Sunyer3, Blandine Laferrère3, Harry R Kissileff7.   

Abstract

Food portion size influences energy intake and sustained high-energy intake often leads to obesity. Virtual portion creation tasks (VPCTs), in which a participant creates portions of food on a computer screen, predict intake in healthy individuals. The objective of this study was to determine whether portions created in VPCTs are stable over time (test-retest reliability) and responsive to factors known to influence food intake, such as eating contexts and food types, and to determine if virtual portions can predict weight loss. Patients with obesity scheduled for bariatric surgery (n = 29), and individuals with a normal BMI (18.5-24.9 kg/m2, controls, n = 29), were instructed to create virtual portions of eight snack foods, which varied in energy density (low and high) and taste (sweet and salty). Portions were created in response to the following eating situations, or "contexts": What they would a) eat to stay healthy (healthy), b) typically eat (typical), c) eat to feel comfortably satisfied (satisfied), d) consider the most that they could tolerate eating (maximum), and e) eat if nothing was limiting them (desired). Tasks were completed before, and 3 months after, surgery in patients, and at two visits, 3 months apart, in controls. Body weight (kg) was recorded at both visits. Virtual portions differed significantly across groups, visits, eating contexts, energy densities (low vs. high), and tastes (sweet vs. salty). Portions created by controls did not change over time, while portions created by patients decreased significantly after surgery, for all contexts except healthy. For patients, desired and healthy portions predicted 3-month weight loss. VPCTs are replicable, responsive to foods and eating contexts, and predict surgical weight loss. These tasks could be useful for individual assessment of expectations of amounts that are eaten in health and disease and for prediction of weight loss.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bariatric surgery; Energy density; Food choice; Obesity; Portion size; Sweet; Weight loss

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32522683      PMCID: PMC7370306          DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.113001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  62 in total

1.  Combined effects of energy density and portion size on energy intake in women.

Authors:  Tanja V E Kral; Liane S Roe; Barbara J Rolls
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 7.045

2.  Food portion size area mediates energy effects on expected anxiety in anorexia nervosa.

Authors:  Musya Herzog; Christopher R Douglas; Harry R Kissileff; Jeffrey M Brunstrom; Katherine Ann Halmi
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 3.868

3.  Expected satiation alone does not predict actual intake of desserts.

Authors:  Etienne Guillocheau; Olga Davidenko; Agnès Marsset-Baglieri; Nicolas Darcel; Claire Gaudichon; Daniel Tomé; Gilles Fromentin
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2017-12-24       Impact factor: 3.868

4.  The Gross Motor Performance Measure: validity and responsiveness of a measure of quality of movement.

Authors:  W F Boyce; C Gowland; P L Rosenbaum; M Lane; N Plews; C H Goldsmith; D J Russell; V Wright; S Potter; D Harding
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1995-07

5.  Caloric intake capacity as measured by a standard nutrient drink test helps to predict weight loss after bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Beatriz Gras-Miralles; Jenny Rosario Haya; José Manuel Ramon Moros; Albert Goday Arnó; Sandra Torra Alsina; Lucas Ilzarbe Sánchez; Jordi Muñoz Galitó; Inés-Ana Ibáñez Zafón; M Carmen Alonso Romera; Alejandra Parri Bonet; Felip Bory Ros; Montserrat Andreu Garcia; Sílvia Delgado-Aros
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  Palatability and intake relationships in free-living humans. characterization and independence of influence in North Americans.

Authors:  J M de Castro; F Bellisle; A M Dalix; S M Pearcey
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2000 Aug-Sep

7.  Bariatric surgery worldwide 2003.

Authors:  Henry Buchwald; Stanley E Williams
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  Acute sleep deprivation increases portion size and affects food choice in young men.

Authors:  Pleunie S Hogenkamp; Emil Nilsson; Victor C Nilsson; Colin D Chapman; Heike Vogel; Lina S Lundberg; Sanaz Zarei; Jonathan Cedernaes; Frida H Rångtell; Jan-Erik Broman; Suzanne L Dickson; Jeffrey M Brunstrom; Christian Benedict; Helgi B Schiöth
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 4.905

9.  Gastric distension and gastric capacity in relation to food intake in humans.

Authors:  A Geliebter
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1988

10.  Direct comparison of the generalized Visual Analog Scale (gVAS) and general Labeled Magnitude Scale (gLMS).

Authors:  John E Hayes; Alissa L Allen; Samantha M Bennett
Journal:  Food Qual Prefer       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 5.565

View more
  2 in total

1.  Recalled and momentary virtual portions created of snacks predict actual intake under laboratory stress condition.

Authors:  Jeon D Hamm; Rebecca R Klatzkin; Musya Herzog; Shoran Tamura; Jeffrey M Brunstrom; Harry R Kissileff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2021-05-29

2.  Development of a Simplified Portion Size Selection Task.

Authors:  Aimee E Pink; Bobby K Cheon
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-05-18
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.